Tools & Wizards About Us
writingmachine.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

writingmachine.com

The home of the Structured Writing Method - Writing Machine Academy

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

862 ms

Page Rendered

216 ms

writingmachine.com screenshot

About Website

Visit writingmachine.com now to see the best up-to-date Writing Machine content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writingmachine.com

Partner with the UK’s leading writing consultancyQuality | Process | Experience | Partnership Read more Transform the way you writeWriting Machine Academy’s business and bid writing training courses a...

Visit writingmachine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingmachine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingmachine.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

writingmachine.com

179 ms

writingmachine.com

348 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

158 ms

style.css

40 ms

theme-my-login.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Writingmachine.com, 84% (37 requests) were made to Writingmachine.wpenginepowered.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (348 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingmachine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

709.6 kB

After Optimization

670.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingmachine.com main page is 709.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 372.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 33.3 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 109.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writing Machine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 372.9 kB
  • After minification 372.9 kB
  • After compression 370.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 184.0 kB
  • After minification 183.7 kB
  • After compression 180.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingmachine.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (66%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Machine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writingmachine.com

writingmachine.com

179 ms

writingmachine.com

writingmachine.com

348 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

158 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

theme-my-login.min.css

theme-my-login.min.css

42 ms

app.css

app.css

55 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

46 ms

style.css

style.css

44 ms

e379325665efe03510e762be88e77d06.min.css

e379325665efe03510e762be88e77d06.min.css

87 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

56 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

52 ms

wdm-cart-validate.js

wdm-cart-validate.js

58 ms

front.js

front.js

61 ms

theme-my-login.min.js

theme-my-login.min.js

63 ms

script.js

script.js

67 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

72 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

70 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

81 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

73 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

82 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

156 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

84 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

155 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

155 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

158 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

157 ms

app.js

app.js

156 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

157 ms

b1e8d3f2da08cf7a5be3ed2395603c20.min.js

b1e8d3f2da08cf7a5be3ed2395603c20.min.js

188 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

73 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

71 ms

WMAgency-Logo-400px.png

WMAgency-Logo-400px.png

93 ms

WMAcademy-Logo-400px.png

WMAcademy-Logo-400px.png

74 ms

logo-open-text.jpg

logo-open-text.jpg

69 ms

logo-grant-thornton.jpg

logo-grant-thornton.jpg

73 ms

logo-lloyds-banking-group-featured.jpg

logo-lloyds-banking-group-featured.jpg

69 ms

logo-towers-watson.jpg

logo-towers-watson.jpg

75 ms

logo-knight-frank-featured.jpg

logo-knight-frank-featured.jpg

77 ms

logo-atkins-featured.jpg

logo-atkins-featured.jpg

82 ms

logo-hays.jpg

logo-hays.jpg

83 ms

logo-premex-featured.jpg

logo-premex-featured.jpg

102 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

125 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

59 ms

Accessibility Review

writingmachine.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

writingmachine.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

writingmachine.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingmachine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingmachine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingmachine.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writing Machine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: