2.7 sec in total
54 ms
1.6 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Writing Web Words content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writingwebwords.com
TORONTO COPYWRITER Delivers Higher Rankings, Sales and More Conversions in 2024 ~ Guaranteed! Contact Writing Web Words Inc | Since 2008.
Visit writingwebwords.comWe analyzed Writingwebwords.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
writingwebwords.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
54 ms
201 ms
36 ms
56 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Writingwebwords.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (333 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingwebwords.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (32%)
3.2 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Writingwebwords.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 124.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 902.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Writing Web Words needs image optimization as it can save up to 902.0 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingwebwords.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (78%)
69
15
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Web Words. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writingwebwords.com
54 ms
www.writingwebwords.com
201 ms
public-main.css
36 ms
style.min.css
56 ms
theme.min.css
65 ms
header-footer.min.css
73 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
94 ms
general.min.css
74 ms
eael-4050.css
75 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
76 ms
swiper.min.css
84 ms
post-1590.css
99 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
99 ms
all.min.css
100 ms
v4-shims.min.css
103 ms
formreset.min.css
104 ms
formsmain.min.css
120 ms
readyclass.min.css
116 ms
browsers.min.css
118 ms
post-4050.css
123 ms
post-5258.css
125 ms
post-1482.css
126 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
142 ms
solid.min.css
139 ms
regular.min.css
142 ms
brands.min.css
145 ms
breeze-prefetch-links.min.js
150 ms
public-main.js
151 ms
jquery.min.js
184 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
168 ms
v4-shims.min.js
169 ms
jquery.json.min.js
169 ms
gravityforms.min.js
173 ms
utils.min.js
177 ms
js
73 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
225 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
223 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
224 ms
widget-posts.min.css
252 ms
general.min.js
240 ms
dom-ready.min.js
213 ms
hooks.min.js
205 ms
i18n.min.js
202 ms
a11y.min.js
203 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
200 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
333 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
321 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
320 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
321 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
315 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
317 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
316 ms
frontend.min.js
303 ms
waypoints.min.js
303 ms
core.min.js
300 ms
frontend.min.js
297 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
297 ms
Writing-Web-Words-logo.png
218 ms
SEO-Copywriter-Writing-Website-Content.jpg
224 ms
MC-LOGO-UPDATE_COLOUR-RGB-768x288.webp
219 ms
PIC-Logo-modified.webp
218 ms
Seneca_College-Logo-768x176.webp
220 ms
pwac.webp
219 ms
app-browser-coffee-6335-compressor-e1637783778441.jpg
220 ms
Local-SEO-Services-1024x684.jpg
222 ms
professional-copywriter-1024x683.jpg
221 ms
Teaching-SEO-Copywriting-1024x683.jpg
224 ms
Corporate-AI-Policy-for-Businesses.jpg
225 ms
Chatgpt-image.png
255 ms
The-Difference-Between-B2B-Web-Content-Versus-B2C-Web-Content.jpg
205 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4QK1O4a0Fg.ttf
41 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4TC1O4a0Fg.ttf
119 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4W61O4a0Fg.ttf
120 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4bC1O4a0Fg.ttf
121 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4TC0O4a0Fg.ttf
121 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4e6yO4a0Fg.ttf
121 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4deyO4a0Fg.ttf
121 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4bCyO4a0Fg.ttf
121 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4ZmyO4a0Fg.ttf
122 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
117 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
28 ms
eicons.woff
101 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
39 ms
writingwebwords.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
writingwebwords.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
writingwebwords.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingwebwords.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingwebwords.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writingwebwords.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writing Web Words. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: