Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

wrmassage.com

White Rock Massage Therapy Clinic l Surrey, B.C.

Page Load Speed

825 ms in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

690 ms

Page Rendered

59 ms

wrmassage.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wrmassage.com now to see the best up-to-date Wr Massage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wrmassage.com

White Rock Massage Therapy Clinic est. 1985 serving the White Rock and South Surrey communities.

Visit wrmassage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wrmassage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 749 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wrmassage.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wrmassage.com

76 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

32 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ce27524c.bundle.min.js

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wrmassage.com, 34% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 34% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (393 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 495.1 kB (52%)

Content Size

943.1 kB

After Optimization

448.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Wrmassage.com main page is 943.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 608.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 487.4 kB

  • Original 608.5 kB
  • After minification 606.8 kB
  • After compression 121.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 487.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 74.8 kB
  • After minification 70.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wr Massage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.8 kB
  • After minification 259.8 kB
  • After compression 256.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wr Massage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wrmassage.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wrmassage.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wrmassage.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrmassage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrmassage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wr Massage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: