Tools & Wizards About Us
wsefs.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

wsefs.com

Fire Alarm + Security Systems | Design, Installation, Inspection, Service Contract, Monitoring Fire Alarms + Security Systems installations + service

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

185 ms

wsefs.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wsefs.com homepage info - get ready to check Wsefs best content right away, or after learning these important things about wsefs.com

Fire Alarm + Security Systems | Complete system installation, monitoring, service contract, repair, annual inspection - authorized Notifier Honeywell Dealer

Visit wsefs.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wsefs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wsefs.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wsefs.com

11 ms

wsefs.com

21 ms

ga.js

30 ms

style.css

268 ms

widget.css

271 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Wsefs.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (599 ms) belongs to the original domain Wsefs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 209.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wsefs.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 35.1 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 44.6 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 123.8 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wsefs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 535.9 kB
  • After minification 535.9 kB
  • After compression 491.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 74.4 kB
  • After minification 74.3 kB
  • After compression 68.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wsefs.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (67%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wsefs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wsefs.com

wsefs.com

11 ms

wsefs.com

wsefs.com

21 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

style.css

style.css

268 ms

widget.css

widget.css

271 ms

theme-my-login.css

theme-my-login.css

271 ms

rainbow.css

rainbow.css

272 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

281 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

279 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

41 ms

form.min.css

form.min.css

336 ms

social_widget.css

social_widget.css

338 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

339 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

403 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

345 ms

sc-catalog.css

sc-catalog.css

348 ms

style.css

style.css

404 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

login-with-ajax.js

login-with-ajax.js

405 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

471 ms

script.js

script.js

412 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

415 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

471 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

473 ms

form.min.js

form.min.js

471 ms

themed-profiles.js

themed-profiles.js

480 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

45 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

481 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

538 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

style.css

style.css

278 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

99 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

73 ms

background.png

background.png

167 ms

logo.png

logo.png

169 ms

menu_background.png

menu_background.png

118 ms

menu_separator.png

menu_separator.png

116 ms

search_hovered.png

search_hovered.png

116 ms

search_field.png

search_field.png

117 ms

search_button.png

search_button.png

183 ms

main_background.png

main_background.png

171 ms

fake_foot.png

fake_foot.png

171 ms

container_alpha.png

container_alpha.png

172 ms

alarms5-918x350.png

alarms5-918x350.png

300 ms

ff2-918x350.png

ff2-918x350.png

493 ms

family1-918x350.png

family1-918x350.png

433 ms

phone1-918x350.png

phone1-918x350.png

558 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

243 ms

info_button.png

info_button.png

251 ms

container_omega.png

container_omega.png

310 ms

gears.png

gears.png

320 ms

superbutton.png

superbutton.png

367 ms

key.png

key.png

379 ms

wrench.png

wrench.png

389 ms

circles1.png

circles1.png

436 ms

true_foot.png

true_foot.png

447 ms

submenu.png

submenu.png

456 ms

footer_mid.png

footer_mid.png

499 ms

footer_sep.png

footer_sep.png

503 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

517 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

525 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

560 ms

email.png

email.png

569 ms

schd.png

schd.png

569 ms

login2.png

login2.png

587 ms

service_request_button.jpg

service_request_button.jpg

591 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

44 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

596 ms

TitilliumText22L005-webfont.woff

TitilliumText22L005-webfont.woff

599 ms

TitilliumText22L004-webfont.woff

TitilliumText22L004-webfont.woff

589 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

js

js

70 ms

Accessibility Review

wsefs.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wsefs.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wsefs.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wsefs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wsefs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wsefs.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wsefs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: