8.1 sec in total
985 ms
3.4 sec
3.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Wtter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wtter.at
Leistungsstarke & hochverfügbare Hosting-Lösungen aus Europa rund um Domain, Website, Online-Shop, Cloud. 30 Jahre Erfahrung & Top-Kundenservice.
Visit wtter.atWe analyzed Wtter.at page load time and found that the first response time was 985 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
wtter.at performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
985 ms
380 ms
343 ms
558 ms
709 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Wtter.at, 35% (11 requests) were made to Ionos.de and 13% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.ionos.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) relates to the external source Ionos.de.
Page size can be reduced by 366.7 kB (49%)
748.6 kB
381.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Wtter.at main page is 748.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 481.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 365.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 365.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wtter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (27%)
30
22
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wtter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ionos.de
985 ms
AC:sc2447-b
380 ms
stacktrace.js
343 ms
bundle.js
558 ms
launch-67fb473cc73f.min.js
709 ms
AC:sc2447-b
950 ms
cxbus.min.js
575 ms
RC5068cb5aadbc4ec1a9aa72b8a74193e0-source.min.js
294 ms
US-recommended-shop.svg
700 ms
vi_psa-nlement.png
598 ms
34715-home-box-big-tvc.jpg
875 ms
34678-ionos-cloud-digital-nlement.png
843 ms
34631-email-icon-pos.svg
800 ms
34664-online-shop-icon-pos.svg
802 ms
34685-webhosting-positive.svg
795 ms
34684-wordpress-hosting-positive.svg
721 ms
34686-virtual-server-pro-positive.svg
839 ms
34702-compute-engine-positive.svg
869 ms
ic-phone.svg
219 ms
ic-user.svg
221 ms
vi-logo.svg
198 ms
ic-s24-regular-arrow-right-blue.svg
284 ms
ic-corporate-checkmark-dark-bg.svg
332 ms
ic-corporate-checkmark-bright-bg.svg
337 ms
JavaScriptErrorCollector
647 ms
RCc392aad5a2a94c84b66143c2c8fb03a6-source.min.js
292 ms
RC5b6d4eb4971a4f719cb6a447536fc6c7-source.min.js
386 ms
34687-my-website-positive.svg
183 ms
34669-Layer_SH.png
179 ms
34622-Testimonial.jpg
305 ms
ac.js
278 ms
wtter.at accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wtter.at best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wtter.at SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wtter.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wtter.at main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wtter.at
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wtter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: