Tools & Wizards About Us
wwb.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

wwb.in

wwb.in Domain Name Is Available to Buy - Domain Name Marketplace

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

264 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

wwb.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wwb content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wwb.in

DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this wwb.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.

Visit wwb.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Wwb.in page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wwb.in performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.285

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wwb.in

264 ms

wwb.in

324 ms

wwb.in

305 ms

googlefonts.css

122 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wwb.in, 65% (26 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 30% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (718 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.3 kB (32%)

Content Size

173.5 kB

After Optimization

117.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wwb.in main page is 173.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 81.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 32.6 kB
  • After minification 32.6 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 31.1 kB

  • Original 81.7 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wwb needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 54.0 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 366 B

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wwb.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wwb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wwb.in

wwb.in

264 ms

wwb.in

wwb.in

324 ms

wwb.in

wwb.in

305 ms

googlefonts.css

googlefonts.css

122 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

127 ms

icon.css

icon.css

122 ms

style4.css

style4.css

141 ms

logo.png

logo.png

165 ms

trust-stamp.png

trust-stamp.png

169 ms

payment.png

payment.png

228 ms

money-back1.png

money-back1.png

223 ms

transfer1.png

transfer1.png

474 ms

secure-payment1.png

secure-payment1.png

245 ms

money-back-w.png

money-back-w.png

476 ms

money-back-img1.png

money-back-img1.png

474 ms

money-back-img2.png

money-back-img2.png

477 ms

money-back-img3.png

money-back-img3.png

476 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

478 ms

fittext.js

fittext.js

476 ms

platform.js

platform.js

718 ms

js

js

91 ms

transper-img1.png

transper-img1.png

499 ms

transper-img2.png

transper-img2.png

501 ms

secure-payment-img1.png

secure-payment-img1.png

500 ms

secure-payment-img2.png

secure-payment-img2.png

536 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

120 ms

default

default

77 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

117 ms

view

view

318 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

50 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

72 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

56 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

71 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

307 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

276 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

39 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

63 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

65 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

61 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

60 ms

Accessibility Review

wwb.in accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

wwb.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wwb.in SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wwb.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wwb.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wwb.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wwb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: