Tools & Wizards About Us
wwrutherford.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

wwrutherford.com

William W. Rutherford & Associates

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

430 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

203 ms

wwrutherford.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wwrutherford.com now to see the best up-to-date Ww Rutherford content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wwrutherford.com

Visit wwrutherford.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wwrutherford.com page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wwrutherford.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wwrutherford.com

430 ms

style.css

75 ms

style.min.css

209 ms

comment-reply.js

190 ms

jquery.min.js

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Wwrutherford.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) belongs to the original domain Wwrutherford.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

853.0 kB

After Optimization

744.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wwrutherford.com main page is 853.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 492.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 25.6 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 492.1 kB
  • After minification 435.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ww Rutherford needs image optimization as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 248.8 kB
  • After minification 248.8 kB
  • After compression 225.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 86.5 kB
  • After compression 78.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wwrutherford.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (46%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ww Rutherford. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wwrutherford.com

www.wwrutherford.com

430 ms

style.css

style.css

75 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

209 ms

comment-reply.js

comment-reply.js

190 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

256 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

196 ms

all.css

all.css

200 ms

jquery.main.js

jquery.main.js

200 ms

jquery.cycle.js

jquery.cycle.js

322 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

270 ms

3S8TwoubGPU

3S8TwoubGPU

131 ms

bg-wrapper.gif

bg-wrapper.gif

75 ms

bg-header.gif

bg-header.gif

75 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

76 ms

bg-navigation.gif

bg-navigation.gif

80 ms

separator.gif

separator.gif

75 ms

ico-phone.png

ico-phone.png

75 ms

ico-email.png

ico-email.png

167 ms

ico-comment.png

ico-comment.png

206 ms

bg-visual.gif

bg-visual.gif

168 ms

bg-section.png

bg-section.png

168 ms

visual1.jpg

visual1.jpg

556 ms

bg-transparent.png

bg-transparent.png

206 ms

bg-navbar.png

bg-navbar.png

558 ms

separator2.gif

separator2.gif

416 ms

bg-section-holder.png

bg-section-holder.png

417 ms

bg-section-frame.jpg

bg-section-frame.jpg

559 ms

bg-graphics.png

bg-graphics.png

554 ms

bg-widget-block.png

bg-widget-block.png

554 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

554 ms

separator-widget.gif

separator-widget.gif

555 ms

quotes.gif

quotes.gif

555 ms

signature.gif

signature.gif

556 ms

bg-footer-holder.gif

bg-footer-holder.gif

555 ms

bullet1.gif

bullet1.gif

555 ms

img-map.jpg

img-map.jpg

557 ms

social.jpg

social.jpg

557 ms

separator3.gif

separator3.gif

575 ms

ga.js

ga.js

21 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

42 ms

base.js

base.js

83 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

204 ms

jKwdeMg5eTlKLUq1BicdQ3joNHiQFKykZS_8AKWMVTU.js

jKwdeMg5eTlKLUq1BicdQ3joNHiQFKykZS_8AKWMVTU.js

137 ms

embed.js

embed.js

46 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

49 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

53 ms

id

id

16 ms

Accessibility Review

wwrutherford.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

wwrutherford.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wwrutherford.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wwrutherford.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wwrutherford.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wwrutherford.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ww Rutherford. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: