Tools & Wizards About Us
www.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 69

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

www.cc

域名售卖

Page Load Speed

10.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

9 sec

Page Rendered

87 ms

www.cc screenshot

About Website

Welcome to www.cc homepage info - get ready to check Www best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about www.cc

www.cc

Visit www.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Www.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

www.cc performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.592

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cc

1174 ms

jquery.js

4373 ms

stat.php

1442 ms

stat.htm

167 ms

core.php

759 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Www.cc, 14% (1 request) were made to Libs.baidu.com and 14% (1 request) were made to S9.cnzz.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source Libs.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.9 kB (52%)

Content Size

98.0 kB

After Optimization

47.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Www.cc main page is 98.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 92.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 4.7 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

  • Original 92.2 kB
  • After minification 92.2 kB
  • After compression 45.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Www. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cc

www.cc

1174 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

4373 ms

stat.php

stat.php

1442 ms

stat.htm

stat.htm

167 ms

core.php

core.php

759 ms

9.gif

9.gif

1279 ms

app.gif

app.gif

1375 ms

Accessibility Review

www.cc accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

www.cc best practices score

69

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Uses deprecated APIs

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

www.cc SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Www.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Www.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

www.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Www. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: