2.9 sec in total
593 ms
1.9 sec
406 ms
Click here to check amazing Tracker Xing content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tracker.xing.com
Over 1 million jobs ✓ 20,000 recruiters ✓ Salary ranges ✓ Employer reviews. Set your job preferences and do your XING!
Visit tracker.xing.comWe analyzed Tracker.xing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
tracker.xing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
593 ms
267 ms
355 ms
356 ms
365 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Tracker.xing.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Login.xing.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Sb.scorecardresearch.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (721 ms) relates to the external source Xing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 319.6 kB (60%)
536.5 kB
216.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tracker.xing.com main page is 536.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 246.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.0 kB, which is 71% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tracker Xing needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 163.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tracker.xing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (22%)
27
21
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tracker Xing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.xing.com
593 ms
layout_responsive-b9f46038c618354dcf1ba04265e2b233.css
267 ms
welcome-57f7f98b689320ac65555b0cd1284e08b193baab5842dfe50c3efdcb070bded0.css
355 ms
responsive-5466074c1a0d4e926c70ec49d574ec0acf22533b45a58a356927f33bbdd908f8.css
356 ms
startpage-8421ca3663070abb84e64d55cd4b4708148815258b2d77252aac36d47dbb89f3.css
365 ms
xing-0a5bb58a05be1c703924cda61c16fb19.js
721 ms
loggedout-e445aa7e2f815eff0c0b62625baa390e.js
363 ms
check
370 ms
sc-1b7ff8550546982ef16d3453fe88aff7.js
455 ms
illustration_companies_low-752cfdb961334950e1510df5e1ec8720d0cb078e0603aadd01bae8b6096b4ef4.jpg
177 ms
illustration_contacts_low-66c922eaf8d253e64cb59131fb61040382fe96c6208d800bd66b645c21bf3de7.jpg
179 ms
illustration_communities_low-8c07035bd65b144d11a18c67348c8b77e68810bcefd9384a459dc86b9b480a98.jpg
179 ms
illustration_secure_low-754a79c5719abbe9a804ba28dd97406990101fb00b9a1b9cb14c4889b61f54a4.jpg
180 ms
illustration_sync_low-bad137965aa1f722a8bb2f5b2a0a8d4843fd5ff80dada389c11a6228c8b08af0.jpg
89 ms
illustration_premium_low-4a5b9ea888bb11aa72b5de89e84b705807835386c44452d66d892705a11f8f9f.jpg
178 ms
sprite_tv_lostart_2-96155e3ced3b28469c74b2dabd3c53e03138ef38a3fb2c7c368d9478ecf48b41.png
165 ms
logo.svg
248 ms
klartext_logo-d8ead4ebe4840c71f0d574e8f5630dd9df8a3fce5aed9e6e01dbda053a3a1845.png
248 ms
dummy_border-204da6c4e557a788574826a139cb8eaba852edf3c2b9fce1c854f1e95544b91c.png
247 ms
icon_jobs-e6d3a8fe8350d1dabac586bf84d4312594336ebbdfcbaef9ee423e3e03651f6b.png
248 ms
icon_contactplus-1c1985cd5ca1e66d6081109b396f5b92f3dabdf601bed267310b2b7dd6b39dfa.png
249 ms
icon_group-e43bb61be49ee46acf9dfca37cc30136983f86770b92f3c30901813f43cf8055.png
250 ms
icon_lock-4d29ceb003b847c404137220df4d392f77f3a849b20d241381104c73db828873.png
333 ms
icon_sync-0ef0e3940bb9265bf5d9d03a82c6fd86b1d1aa661a62e22390de3194534020be.png
333 ms
AppleStore_Icon-d98b16c8681ad681732171ee412c55682e2aa9d20613a74adcfb828274734ab6.png
333 ms
GooglePlay_Icon-e50a541692919675a466da442977490694d1630c8eafe14220325dded401b024.png
334 ms
WindowsStore_Icon-dc76b0e5033ab68d9f52e7d5e1a58c455e3a388cddc3de39aca45391f31cba4b.png
334 ms
r2
4 ms
tracker.xing.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tracker.xing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tracker.xing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tracker.xing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tracker.xing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tracker.xing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tracker Xing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: