Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

xanderfield.com

XanderField – Creating Online Tools for Business Success

Page Load Speed

29.8 sec in total

First Response

7.5 sec

Resources Loaded

18.1 sec

Page Rendered

4.2 sec

xanderfield.com screenshot

About Website

Visit xanderfield.com now to see the best up-to-date Xander Field content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xanderfield.com

Welcome to the Start of Your New Web Presence! Amazing Websites Are Born Here! Welcome to the home of beautiful, innovative & effective, handcrafted brands and websites! And we’d love to share informa...

Visit xanderfield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xanderfield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.5 sec and then it took 22.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xanderfield.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

xanderfield.com

7492 ms

js

362 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

992 ms

style.min.css

1469 ms

styles.css

756 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Xanderfield.com, 25% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Xanderfield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 883.3 kB (31%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Xanderfield.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 118.0 kB

  • Original 138.9 kB
  • After minification 130.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xander Field images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 224.6 kB

  • Original 322.1 kB
  • After minification 316.5 kB
  • After compression 97.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 525.2 kB

  • Original 599.5 kB
  • After minification 558.6 kB
  • After compression 74.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xanderfield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 525.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (65%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xander Field. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

xanderfield.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xanderfield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xanderfield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xander Field. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: