1.9 sec in total
44 ms
1.6 sec
267 ms
Click here to check amazing Xbiom content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xbiom.com
PointCross Life Sciences offers interim study monitoring for clinical trials and Nonclinical studies compliant with CDISC, PDMA and FDA standards.
Visit xbiom.comWe analyzed Xbiom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
xbiom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value2,560 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
44 ms
57 ms
12 ms
89 ms
89 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xbiom.com, 61% (46 requests) were made to Pointcrosslifesciences.com and 21% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (735 ms) relates to the external source Pointcrosslifesciences.com.
Page size can be reduced by 180.3 kB (20%)
905.9 kB
725.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Xbiom.com main page is 905.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 300.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xbiom needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xbiom.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (87%)
53
7
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xbiom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xbiom.com
44 ms
pointcrosslifesciences.com
57 ms
style.min.css
12 ms
jquery.powertip.min.css
89 ms
maps_points.css
89 ms
rs6.css
118 ms
style.css
102 ms
dashicons.min.css
99 ms
js_composer.min.css
188 ms
bootstrap.css
91 ms
plugins.css
241 ms
theme.css
247 ms
shortcodes.css
281 ms
dynamic_style.css
335 ms
style.css
119 ms
style.css
120 ms
jquery.min.js
146 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
151 ms
rbtools.min.js
168 ms
rs6.min.js
173 ms
js
65 ms
js
101 ms
js
120 ms
v2.js
52 ms
css
36 ms
css
51 ms
jquery.powertip.min.js
208 ms
maps_points.js
206 ms
live-search.js
207 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
208 ms
maxmegamenu.js
208 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
208 ms
popper.min.js
217 ms
bootstrap.js
211 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
214 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
219 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
220 ms
jquery.matchHeight.min.js
224 ms
modernizr.js
225 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
231 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
230 ms
theme.js
239 ms
theme-async.js
238 ms
countup.min.js
240 ms
countup-loader.min.js
249 ms
webfont.js
86 ms
gfoeakw13s
108 ms
gfoeakw13s
192 ms
PC-Blue-Logo.png
76 ms
pcls-logo_white.png
77 ms
Untitled-design.png
76 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
735 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
127 ms
wARDj0u
10 ms
css
50 ms
clarity.js
73 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
99 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
100 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
541 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
541 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
544 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
543 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
545 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
542 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
542 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
543 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
544 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
546 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf
544 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
546 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
546 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
546 ms
x-twitter.svg
76 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
532 ms
c.gif
11 ms
xbiom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xbiom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
xbiom.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xbiom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xbiom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xbiom.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xbiom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: