718 ms in total
60 ms
535 ms
123 ms
Welcome to xceptional.io homepage info - get ready to check Xceptional best content right away, or after learning these important things about xceptional.io
Visit xceptional.ioWe analyzed Xceptional.io page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 658 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
xceptional.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
28/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
60 ms
22 ms
27 ms
35 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Xceptional.io, 23% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Js.hs-scripts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (318 ms) relates to the external source Js.hs-scripts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 344.8 kB (18%)
2.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Xceptional.io main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 259.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 259.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xceptional images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 71.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xceptional.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)
45
5
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xceptional. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xceptionalacademy.org.au
60 ms
style.min.css
22 ms
animate.css
27 ms
content_elements.crush.css
35 ms
slick.css
33 ms
style.css
58 ms
style.min.css
30 ms
styles.css
52 ms
style.min.css
52 ms
latest.css
55 ms
style.css
65 ms
edge.css
83 ms
css
60 ms
style.css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
83 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
84 ms
functions.js
100 ms
ays-pb-public.js
100 ms
slick.min.js
102 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
102 ms
content_elements.js
106 ms
bt-bb-light.js
106 ms
bold-timeline.js
105 ms
jquery.dd.js
104 ms
cc.main.js
108 ms
46456580.js
178 ms
ays-pb-public-min.css
157 ms
coblocks-animation.js
155 ms
tiny-swiper.js
156 ms
coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js
157 ms
hooks.min.js
156 ms
i18n.min.js
170 ms
index.js
174 ms
index.js
171 ms
46456580.js
318 ms
fancySelect.js
175 ms
header.misc.js
172 ms
misc.js
175 ms
bt_bb_elements.js
174 ms
XA-logo-hor_gray-bg.png
26 ms
pexels-jopwell-2422293.jpg
77 ms
AdobeStock_819938077-1-1280x1280-1.jpeg
30 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58i-xw.ttf
29 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58i-xw.ttf
42 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58i-xw.ttf
51 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58i-xw.ttf
60 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58i-xw.ttf
61 ms
banner.js
119 ms
collectedforms.js
117 ms
46456580.js
96 ms
print.css
24 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4e6yO4i0Fg.ttf
4 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4deyO4i0Fg.ttf
23 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4bCyO4i0Fg.ttf
29 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4ZmyO4i0Fg.ttf
12 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4QK1O4i0Fg.ttf
30 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4TC1O4i0Fg.ttf
31 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4W61O4i0Fg.ttf
33 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4bC1O4i0Fg.ttf
33 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4TC0O4i0Fg.ttf
34 ms
u-490qaujRI2PbsvB_xykgxu.ttf
54 ms
FontAwesome.woff
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
35 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
35 ms
xceptional.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xceptional.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xceptional.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xceptional.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xceptional.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xceptional.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xceptional. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: