3 sec in total
25 ms
2.6 sec
346 ms
Click here to check amazing Xcite Tech content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xcitetech.com
Xcite Tech is the top aesthetic equipment suppliers & premier provider of aesthetic medical equipment, medical laser Canada, Exosome treatment & more.
Visit xcitetech.comWe analyzed Xcitetech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xcitetech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
25 ms
33 ms
62 ms
73 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Xcitetech.com, 14% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Xcitetech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 279.5 kB (21%)
1.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Xcitetech.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 572.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xcite Tech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 128.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.7 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xcitetech.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (88%)
94
11
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xcite Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xcitetech.com
25 ms
xcitetech.com
33 ms
child-theme-generator-public.css
62 ms
styles.css
73 ms
css
50 ms
style.min.css
32 ms
css
60 ms
public.css
99 ms
style.css
105 ms
airdatepicker.css
89 ms
um-fonticons-ii.css
98 ms
um-fonticons-fa.css
125 ms
select2.min.css
68 ms
um-crop.css
127 ms
um-modal.css
90 ms
um-styles.css
152 ms
um-profile.css
121 ms
um-account.css
127 ms
um-misc.css
127 ms
um-fileupload.css
143 ms
default.css
145 ms
default.date.css
148 ms
default.time.css
149 ms
um-raty.css
149 ms
simplebar.css
190 ms
um-tipsy.css
146 ms
um-responsive.css
171 ms
um-old-default.css
173 ms
style.css
172 ms
jquery.min.js
204 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
151 ms
child-theme-generator-public.js
216 ms
um-gdpr.min.js
222 ms
t.js
40 ms
submit.js
172 ms
index.js
234 ms
index.js
234 ms
20488692.js
80 ms
scripts.min.js
304 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
285 ms
jquery.mobile.js
285 ms
mc-validate.js
54 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
284 ms
common.js
264 ms
lepopup.js
248 ms
airdatepicker.js
227 ms
select2.full.min.js
225 ms
underscore.min.js
203 ms
wp-util.min.js
232 ms
um-crop.min.js
227 ms
um-modal.min.js
214 ms
um-jquery-form.min.js
223 ms
um-fileupload.js
207 ms
picker.js
232 ms
picker.date.js
232 ms
picker.time.js
229 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
199 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
245 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
242 ms
hooks.min.js
240 ms
i18n.min.js
239 ms
um-raty.min.js
254 ms
um-tipsy.min.js
254 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
311 ms
masonry.min.js
318 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
296 ms
simplebar.min.js
223 ms
um-functions.min.js
290 ms
um-responsive.min.js
293 ms
um-conditional.min.js
276 ms
um-scripts.min.js
247 ms
um-profile.min.js
254 ms
gtm.js
103 ms
et-divi-dynamic-4-late.css
239 ms
um-account.min.js
236 ms
Xcite_Logo_RGB_Horizontal_Full_Charcoal.png
325 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
69 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
71 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
103 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
127 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
127 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
126 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
126 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
126 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
118 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFWUUz.woff
129 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFWUUz.woff
179 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFWUUz.woff
177 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FWUUz.woff
178 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FWUUz.woff
180 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FWUUz.woff
181 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FWUUz.woff
180 ms
modules.ttf
274 ms
new-2.jpg
396 ms
Fine-lines-wrinkles-images-s.jpg
394 ms
tattoo-removal-image-s.jpg
393 ms
Jetpeel-banner-s.jpg
434 ms
js
41 ms
js
101 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
destination
97 ms
destination
93 ms
loader.js
29 ms
20488692.js
88 ms
call-tracking_7.js
7 ms
collect
108 ms
20488692.js
228 ms
fb.js
198 ms
collectedforms.js
201 ms
banner.js
237 ms
collect
196 ms
admin-ajax.php
1676 ms
wcm
62 ms
ga-audiences
47 ms
style.min.css
88 ms
xcitetech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xcitetech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
xcitetech.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xcitetech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xcitetech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xcitetech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xcite Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: