Tools & Wizards About Us
xcomfort.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

xcomfort.no

Electrical and Industrial | Power management solutions | Eaton

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

xcomfort.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xcomfort content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xcomfort.no

Diversified power management company and global technology leader in electrical systems for power quality, distribution and control; hydraulics components, systems and services for industrial and mobi...

Visit xcomfort.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Xcomfort.no page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xcomfort.no performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xcomfort.no

174 ms

www.xcomfort.no

66 ms

installator.html

240 ms

383 ms

clientlib-all.min.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Xcomfort.no, 37% (15 requests) were made to Eaton.com and 17% (7 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

893.5 kB

After Optimization

805.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xcomfort.no main page is 893.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 726.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 81.0 kB

  • Original 96.4 kB
  • After minification 78.2 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 69.7 kB
  • After minification 68.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xcomfort images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 726.0 kB
  • After minification 726.0 kB
  • After compression 721.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 771 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 578 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xcomfort.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 771 B or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (67%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xcomfort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xcomfort.no

xcomfort.no

174 ms

www.xcomfort.no

www.xcomfort.no

66 ms

installator.html

installator.html

240 ms

383 ms

clientlib-all.min.css

clientlib-all.min.css

85 ms

clientlib-jquery.min.js

clientlib-jquery.min.js

319 ms

launch-37c856b2d101.min.js

launch-37c856b2d101.min.js

418 ms

overlay.css

overlay.css

351 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

355 ms

ponyfill.min.js

ponyfill.min.js

348 ms

csrf.min.js

csrf.min.js

347 ms

clientlib-all.min.js

clientlib-all.min.js

502 ms

5ZND6-PPFCN-KKCXK-TZT96-3Y7N9

5ZND6-PPFCN-KKCXK-TZT96-3Y7N9

116 ms

uwt.js

uwt.js

445 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

445 ms

js

js

1910 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

1645 ms

eaton-glyphicon.ttf

eaton-glyphicon.ttf

265 ms

c464d017147b.js

c464d017147b.js

1489 ms

token.json

token.json

1379 ms

RCc6758b92c6024623905368f45083199b-source.min.js

RCc6758b92c6024623905368f45083199b-source.min.js

422 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

616 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

613 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

617 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

613 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

613 ms

config.json

config.json

295 ms

eaton-logo-small.png

eaton-logo-small.png

252 ms

elqCfg.min.js

elqCfg.min.js

497 ms

identity.js

identity.js

65 ms

193550921407262

193550921407262

64 ms

47c9c6e8-ff2d-438e-bdfa-dc8e7a04213c.json

47c9c6e8-ff2d-438e-bdfa-dc8e7a04213c.json

56 ms

location

location

262 ms

js

js

198 ms

js

js

338 ms

js

js

337 ms

js

js

335 ms

js

js

336 ms

js

js

335 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

140 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

90 ms

Accessibility Review

xcomfort.no accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

xcomfort.no best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

xcomfort.no SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xcomfort.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Norwegian language. Our system also found out that Xcomfort.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xcomfort.no

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xcomfort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: