Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

xelaweb.com

CARI.lat

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

617 ms

xelaweb.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xelaweb content for Guatemala. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xelaweb.com

Soporte 24/7 y servicios administrados en nuestros centros de datos, tus mejores asesores en tecnología

Visit xelaweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xelaweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xelaweb.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.668

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xelaweb.com

165 ms

xelaweb.com

317 ms

language-selector.css

80 ms

jquery.min.js

83 ms

colorbox.css

153 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Xelaweb.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Xelaweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

867.4 kB

After Optimization

815.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Xelaweb.com main page is 867.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 786.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 46.6 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 786.3 kB
  • After minification 783.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xelaweb images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xelaweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (60%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xelaweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xelaweb.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

xelaweb.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

xelaweb.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xelaweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xelaweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xelaweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: