4.4 sec in total
397 ms
3.7 sec
304 ms
Visit xenagos.de now to see the best up-to-date Xenagos content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xenagos.de
Personalberatung für Fach- und Führungspositionen. Zuverlässig und passgenau: Profitieren Sie von unseren Komplett-Paketen und Festpreisen. Erfahren Sie mehr.
Visit xenagos.deWe analyzed Xenagos.de page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
xenagos.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value17.5 s
0/100
10%
Value3,860 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.092
92/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
397 ms
561 ms
218 ms
337 ms
330 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Xenagos.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to App.eu.usercentrics.eu and 1% (1 request) were made to Sdp.eu.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Xenagos.de.
Page size can be reduced by 206.3 kB (14%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Xenagos.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 829.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xenagos needs image optimization as it can save up to 95.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (81%)
73
14
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xenagos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xenagos.de
397 ms
xenagos.de
561 ms
font-awesome.min.css
218 ms
style.min.css
337 ms
styles.css
330 ms
dashicons.min.css
443 ms
job-listings.css
333 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
333 ms
all.min.css
444 ms
back-compat.min.css
440 ms
Defaults.css
443 ms
js_composer.min.css
683 ms
font.css
447 ms
main.min.css
670 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
552 ms
wpbakery.min.css
553 ms
post-type.min.css
555 ms
css-vars.css
556 ms
custom.css
696 ms
media.css
666 ms
mega-menu.css
665 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
680 ms
style.css
774 ms
xenagos.de
1334 ms
font.css
778 ms
ultimate.min.css
901 ms
jquery.min.js
789 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
782 ms
moment-with-locales.min.js
1000 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
890 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
893 ms
jquery.viewportchecker.js
899 ms
doT.min.js
1000 ms
social-stream.js
1004 ms
rbtools.min.js
1126 ms
rs6.min.js
1146 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
1111 ms
loader.js
61 ms
uc-block.bundle.js
79 ms
api.js
32 ms
stripes.css
1017 ms
font.css
903 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
903 ms
rs6.css
902 ms
core.min.js
899 ms
ultimate.min.js
917 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
824 ms
main.min.js
1081 ms
legacy.min.js
1066 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
1067 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
1067 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
961 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
969 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
966 ms
index.js
965 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
856 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
853 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
1032 ms
vc-tabs.min.js
1034 ms
gtm.js
206 ms
Logo-Xenagos-ohne-Schriftzug-200x60-2.png
292 ms
Logo-Xenagos-ohne-Schriftzug-135x40-1.png
293 ms
at.png
292 ms
us.png
291 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
343 ms
Kopf-halb-2560x640-1-e1679409505932.png
342 ms
Kopf-Danke-1-945x1024.png
1247 ms
personalberatung-vertrieb-paket-harpoon-classic-150x150.png
343 ms
personalberatung-vertrieb-paket-harpoon-plus-150x150.png
343 ms
personalberatung-vertrieb-paket-harpoon-special-150x150.png
342 ms
personalberatung-vertrieb-paket-executive-search-150x150.png
483 ms
bundle_legacy.js
76 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
390 ms
Defaults.woff
390 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
762 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
388 ms
recaptcha__en.js
68 ms
languages.json
379 ms
print.css
112 ms
xenagos.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xenagos.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xenagos.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xenagos.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xenagos.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xenagos.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xenagos. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: