Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

xfilesharingtemplates.com

xFileSharing Templates

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

258 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

xfilesharingtemplates.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xfilesharingtemplates.com homepage info - get ready to check XFileSharing Templates best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about xfilesharingtemplates.com

Visit xfilesharingtemplates.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xfilesharingtemplates.com page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xfilesharingtemplates.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xfilesharingtemplates.com

258 ms

bootstrap.min.css

126 ms

all.min.css

136 ms

templatemo-style.css

123 ms

plugins.js

237 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Xfilesharingtemplates.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Mylivechat.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S2.mylivechat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) belongs to the original domain Xfilesharingtemplates.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (30%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Xfilesharingtemplates.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 44.6 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 992.2 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, XFileSharing Templates needs image optimization as it can save up to 992.2 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 74.4 kB
  • After minification 74.4 kB
  • After compression 55.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 51.3 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xfilesharingtemplates.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XFileSharing Templates. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

xfilesharingtemplates.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

xfilesharingtemplates.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xfilesharingtemplates.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xfilesharingtemplates.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xfilesharingtemplates.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XFileSharing Templates. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: