Tools & Wizards About Us
xhcode.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

xhcode.com

Json Online Parsing and Formatter-Json Online Checking Json Formatter Compression-Jsons Online Converter Tools

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

701 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

283 ms

xhcode.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xhcode.com homepage info - get ready to check Xhcode best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about xhcode.com

XhCode has an easy to use online tool to convert your data, json online parsing, json Formatter, json parsing, json, json online Formatter, json verification tool, json compression, json serialization...

Visit xhcode.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xhcode.com page load time and found that the first response time was 701 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xhcode.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xhcode.com

701 ms

xhcode.com

969 ms

json_to_xml_converter.css

705 ms

style.css

1183 ms

new-examples.css

704 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Xhcode.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Xhcode.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 49.6 kB (25%)

Content Size

200.6 kB

After Optimization

151.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xhcode.com main page is 200.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 69.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 43.2 kB
  • After minification 32.5 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 34.9 kB
  • After minification 23.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xhcode needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 471 B

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 68.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 671 B

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 53.6 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xhcode.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xhcode. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xhcode.com

xhcode.com

701 ms

xhcode.com

xhcode.com

969 ms

json_to_xml_converter.css

json_to_xml_converter.css

705 ms

style.css

style.css

1183 ms

new-examples.css

new-examples.css

704 ms

share.js

share.js

705 ms

coreui.bundle.min.js

coreui.bundle.min.js

947 ms

simplebar.min.js

simplebar.min.js

951 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

1405 ms

js

js

113 ms

logo.png

logo.png

978 ms

logo-share.png

logo-share.png

746 ms

free.svg

free.svg

747 ms

brand.svg

brand.svg

753 ms

Accessibility Review

xhcode.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

xhcode.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xhcode.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xhcode.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Xhcode.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xhcode.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xhcode. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: