Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

22.2 sec in total

First Response

7.1 sec

Resources Loaded

14.6 sec

Page Rendered

535 ms

xigsa.com screenshot

About Website

Visit xigsa.com now to see the best up-to-date Xigsa content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xigsa.com

Visit xigsa.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xigsa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.1 sec and then it took 15.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xigsa.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.xigsa.com

7097 ms

twitter-feed.min.css

498 ms

font-awesome.min.css

7 ms

css.bootstrap.css

1298 ms

css.core.css

1556 ms

Our browser made a total of 223 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (136 requests) were addressed to the original Xigsa.com, 10% (22 requests) were made to 0.gravatar.com and 8% (17 requests) were made to 1.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Xigsa.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (38%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Xigsa.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 536.9 kB

  • Original 594.2 kB
  • After minification 561.9 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 536.9 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 331.2 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xigsa needs image optimization as it can save up to 331.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 780.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 389.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 780.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 322.6 kB

  • Original 386.0 kB
  • After minification 347.1 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xigsa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 322.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (14%)

Requests Now

211

After Optimization

181

The browser has sent 211 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xigsa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xigsa.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

xigsa.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xigsa.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xigsa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Xigsa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xigsa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: