Tools & Wizards About Us
xinelaine.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

xinelaine.com

xinelaine | Photos and Film by Christy Flaherty - Cinematic Portrait Photographer

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

717 ms

Page Rendered

846 ms

xinelaine.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xinelaine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xinelaine.com

Christy Flaherty is a self-taught cinematic photographer living in Georgia, USA - specializing in digital, 35mm photography, and VHS video.

Visit xinelaine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xinelaine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xinelaine.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xinelaine.com

88 ms

xinelaine.com

102 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

19 ms

style.min.css

58 ms

classic-themes.min.css

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Xinelaine.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (393 ms) belongs to the original domain Xinelaine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 89.3 kB (1%)

Content Size

11.1 MB

After Optimization

11.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xinelaine.com main page is 11.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 86.9 kB

  • Original 102.8 kB
  • After minification 102.1 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 10.7 MB
  • After minification 10.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xinelaine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 572 B

  • Original 127.6 kB
  • After minification 127.6 kB
  • After compression 127.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 311 B

  • Original 130.3 kB
  • After minification 130.3 kB
  • After compression 130.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xinelaine.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (41%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xinelaine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xinelaine.com

xinelaine.com

88 ms

xinelaine.com

xinelaine.com

102 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

58 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

102 ms

styles.css

styles.css

52 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

105 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

103 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

85 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

111 ms

js

js

61 ms

index.js

index.js

150 ms

index.js

index.js

149 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

156 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

152 ms

us.core.min.js

us.core.min.js

176 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

187 ms

royalslider.js

royalslider.js

167 ms

hotjar-1324028.js

hotjar-1324028.js

113 ms

XINELAINE.svg

XINELAINE.svg

74 ms

xinelaine86.jpg

xinelaine86.jpg

133 ms

xinelaine64.jpg

xinelaine64.jpg

129 ms

xinelaine19.jpg

xinelaine19.jpg

124 ms

xinelaine107.gif

xinelaine107.gif

170 ms

xinelaine11.jpg

xinelaine11.jpg

146 ms

xinelaine99.gif

xinelaine99.gif

187 ms

xinelaine88.jpg

xinelaine88.jpg

188 ms

xinelaine71.jpg

xinelaine71.jpg

215 ms

xinelaine3.gif

xinelaine3.gif

242 ms

xinelaine85.jpg

xinelaine85.jpg

241 ms

xinelaine91.gif

xinelaine91.gif

328 ms

xinelaine43.jpg

xinelaine43.jpg

333 ms

xinelaine98.gif

xinelaine98.gif

289 ms

xinelaine55.jpg

xinelaine55.jpg

297 ms

xinelaine77.jpg

xinelaine77.jpg

378 ms

xinelaine65.jpg

xinelaine65.jpg

354 ms

xinelaine23.jpg

xinelaine23.jpg

358 ms

xinelaine42.jpg

xinelaine42.jpg

372 ms

xinelaine81.jpg

xinelaine81.jpg

393 ms

xinelaine44.jpg

xinelaine44.jpg

390 ms

pxiKyp0ihIEF2isfFJA.ttf

pxiKyp0ihIEF2isfFJA.ttf

90 ms

Accessibility Review

xinelaine.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

xinelaine.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

xinelaine.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xinelaine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xinelaine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xinelaine.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xinelaine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: