3.4 sec in total
361 ms
2.9 sec
146 ms
Welcome to xip.pl homepage info - get ready to check XIP best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about xip.pl
Domeny w xIP.pl: rejestracja domen, parkowanie domen, hosting w eHost. Tanie domeny: pl com net org info
Visit xip.plWe analyzed Xip.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 361 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xip.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value8.0 s
3/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.427
22/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
361 ms
1326 ms
325 ms
341 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Xip.pl, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Xip.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 630.4 kB (73%)
868.5 kB
238.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Xip.pl main page is 868.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 469.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, XIP needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 49% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 112.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 389.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xip.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (56%)
43
19
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xip.pl
361 ms
www.xip.pl
1326 ms
animate.min.css
325 ms
style.css
341 ms
css
34 ms
genericons.css
457 ms
1-style.css
571 ms
venobox.css
345 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
356 ms
theme.css
761 ms
bootstrap-grid.min.css
456 ms
font-awesome.min.css
461 ms
jquery.js
711 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
572 ms
counter.js
573 ms
wow.min.js
576 ms
main.js
685 ms
venobox.min.js
684 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
686 ms
pta.style.min.css
589 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
716 ms
functions.js
715 ms
szp-embed.min.js
716 ms
pta.engine.min.js
715 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
760 ms
mp-waypoint-animations.js
768 ms
css
18 ms
css
24 ms
ehost-logo.png
135 ms
ehost-tel.png
135 ms
banner.png
241 ms
home1.png
136 ms
script1.png
159 ms
script2.png
190 ms
script3.png
239 ms
script4.png
241 ms
script5.png
248 ms
script6.png
278 ms
script7.png
300 ms
script8.png
353 ms
script9.png
354 ms
script10.png
357 ms
script11.png
363 ms
script12.png
397 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
51 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
84 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
91 ms
Genericons.svg
383 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
44 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
509 ms
Genericons.ttf
367 ms
xip.pl accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
xip.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xip.pl SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PL
PL
ISO-8859-2
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xip.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xip.pl main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-2. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
xip.pl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XIP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: