Analyze

xlcomparator.net: Compare two Excel spreadsheets without programming macro nor installing any software on your computer

XL Comparator is a free tool to compare two Excel or CSV spreadsheets without programming Excel macros nor installing software on your computer.

Page load speed analysis

  • 66/100

    Normal result
  • 4

    Successful tests
  • 4

    Failed tests
  • First response

    399 ms

  • Resources loaded

    1.7 sec

  • Page rendered

    140 ms

  • Total page load time

    2.2 sec

Welcome to xlcomparator.net homepage info - get ready to check Xlcomparator best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about xlcomparator.net

We analyzed Xlcomparator.net page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Page optimization

  • HTML 23.6 kB
    Images 19.4 kB
    Javascripts 148.5 kB
    CSS 4.3 kB

    In fact, the total size of Xlcomparator.net main page is 195.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 148.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

    • Original 23.6 kB
    • After minification 23.5 kB
    • After compression 6.7 kB

    HTML optimization

    HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

    • Original 19.4 kB
    • After optimization 15.9 kB

    Image optimization

    Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xlcomparator needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

    • Original 148.5 kB
    • After minification 147.9 kB
    • After compression 56.2 kB

    JavaScript optimization

    It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

    • Original 4.3 kB
    • After minification 3.6 kB
    • After compression 1.3 kB

    CSS optimization

    CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xlcomparator.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Network requests diagram

  • xlcomparator.net
  • style.css
  • theme.css
  • fond.css
  • police_moyenne.css
  • assistants.css
  • lightbox.css
  • cookie.js
  • show_ads.js
  • fond.gif
  • logo_165x113.png
  • onglet_on_gauche.png
  • onglet_on_droite.png
  • onglet_off_gauche2.png
  • onglet_off_droite.png
  • onglet_off_gauche1.png
  • drapeau_fr_18x13.png
  • bandeau_sous_barre.png
  • Etape01_En_787x76.gif
  • puce1_40x40.png
  • puce2_40x40.png
  • ca-pub-5093353905917837.js
  • zrt_lookup.html
  • show_ads_impl.js
  • ga.js
  • __utm.gif
  • all.js
  • ads
  • osd.js
  • ads
  • xd_arbiter.php
  • xd_arbiter.php
  • abg.js
  • m_js_controller.js
  • favicon
  • s
  • googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
  • nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
  • x_button_blue2.png
  • ui
  • Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
  • like.php
  • 05-jfvEi0Bv.js
  • LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Xlcomparator.net, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (399 ms) belongs to the original domain Xlcomparator.net.

Additional info on xlcomparator.net

Requests

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xlcomparator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

11

Javascripts

18

Images

6

CSS

7

AJAX

42

All

Possible request optimization

1

Javascripts

7

Images

1

CSS

7

AJAX

26

Optimized

16

All

Normal result

IP address

Xlcomparator.net uses IP address which is currently shared with 4 other domains. The more sites share the same IP address, the higher the host server’s workload is. It is strongly recommended that the host server should be changed or the hosting provider should be requested to give a different (separate) IP address for this domain.

Poor result

IP Trace

xlcomparator.net

1000films.com

debugbar.com

viruskeeper.com

passionautomobile.com

62.210.16.61

DNS records

Type Host Target/ip TTL Other
A

xlcomparator.net

62.210.16.61 299
NS

xlcomparator.net

ns1.online.net 299
NS

xlcomparator.net

ns0.online.net 299
SOA

xlcomparator.net

3599 Mname: ns0.online.net
Rname: hostmaster.proxad.net
Serial: 1313025406
Refresh: 3600
Retry: 1800
Expire: 1209600
Minimum-ttl: 300
MX

xlcomparator.net

mx.online.net 299 Pri: 10

Language and encoding

Normal result

Language

EN en language flag

Detected

N/A  language flag

Claimed

Encoding

UTF-8

Claimed

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xlcomparator.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xlcomparator.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

HTTPS certificate

SSL Certificate

Xlcomparator.net has no SSL certificate. Web browsing can be safer with HTTPS connection, so we suggest that it should be obtained for this site.

Poor result

Visitor World Map

Country of origin for 38.7% of all visits is India. It lies approximately 4500 miles away from the server location (France) and such a long distance can negatively affect website speed, as it takes some time for data to travel back and forth between those places. That’s why one of the best ways to speed up Xlcomparator.net page load time for the majority of users is moving the server to India or just closer to the user base.

Poor result

Poor result

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xlcomparator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

xlcomparator.net

Newly indexed topics

Share this report in social media

Analyze another website

Analyze