3.2 sec in total
345 ms
2.6 sec
314 ms
Visit xlet.to now to see the best up-to-date Xlet content for Venezuela and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xlet.to
Xleet Shop Buy Tools, Shells, web shell, RDP, SSH, cPanel, Mailer, SMTP, Leads, Webmail, Cards, Account, Pages, Xleet, Xleet SHOP, Xleet store
Visit xlet.toWe analyzed Xlet.to page load time and found that the first response time was 345 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xlet.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value17.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,930 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
345 ms
156 ms
281 ms
340 ms
356 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Xlet.to, 21% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 17% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (840 ms) belongs to the original domain Xlet.to.
Page size can be reduced by 12.4 kB (9%)
138.9 kB
126.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Xlet.to main page is 138.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 64.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xlet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 114 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xlet.to has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (67%)
21
7
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xlet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xlet.to
345 ms
login
156 ms
normalize.css
281 ms
bootstrap.css
340 ms
font-awesome.css
356 ms
all.min.js
639 ms
login.css
308 ms
api.js
129 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
319 ms
bootstrap.min.js
840 ms
js
135 ms
css
61 ms
0.png
275 ms
bg.png
330 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
250 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
291 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
293 ms
recaptcha__en.js
291 ms
analytics.js
204 ms
anchor
67 ms
collect
262 ms
styles__ltr.css
5 ms
recaptcha__en.js
15 ms
webworker.js
170 ms
logo_48.png
130 ms
recaptcha__en.js
39 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
37 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
55 ms
xlet.to accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xlet.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
xlet.to SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xlet.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xlet.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xlet.to
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xlet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: