Tools & Wizards About Us
xmail.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

xmail.net

XMAIL.NET™ - Free Web Based XMail

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

233 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

71 ms

xmail.net screenshot

About Website

Visit xmail.net now to see the best up-to-date XMAIL content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xmail.net

XMAIL.NET - Free Web Based XMail

Visit xmail.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Xmail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xmail.net performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xmail.net

233 ms

xmail.net

299 ms

all.css

67 ms

allm.css

134 ms

jquery-1.4.2.js

335 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Xmail.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (335 ms) belongs to the original domain Xmail.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.3 kB (67%)

Content Size

143.3 kB

After Optimization

48.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xmail.net main page is 143.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 82.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 82.5 kB
  • After minification 81.8 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 11.4 kB
  • After minification 10.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, XMAIL needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 30.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 208 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xmail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 208 B or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XMAIL. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

xmail.net

xmail.net

233 ms

xmail.net

xmail.net

299 ms

all.css

all.css

67 ms

allm.css

allm.css

134 ms

jquery-1.4.2.js

jquery-1.4.2.js

335 ms

shadedborder.min.js

shadedborder.min.js

198 ms

xmail_logo_t.png

xmail_logo_t.png

67 ms

mail2.gif

mail2.gif

65 ms

b_shadow_l.gif

b_shadow_l.gif

66 ms

b_shadow.gif

b_shadow.gif

67 ms

b_shadow_r.gif

b_shadow_r.gif

86 ms

b.gif

b.gif

92 ms

Accessibility Review

xmail.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

xmail.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

xmail.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xmail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xmail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xmail.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XMAIL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: