4.4 sec in total
646 ms
3.5 sec
226 ms
Click here to check amazing Xmanager content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xmanager.com
NetSarang Software combines performance, security, and usability for a complete network connectivity experience.
Visit xmanager.comWe analyzed Xmanager.com page load time and found that the first response time was 646 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
xmanager.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value490 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
646 ms
211 ms
256 ms
221 ms
216 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Xmanager.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Netsarang.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Xmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 232.1 kB (21%)
1.1 MB
863.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Xmanager.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 570.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xmanager needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 751 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 398 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xmanager.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (86%)
76
11
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xmanager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
646 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
211 ms
style.min.css
256 ms
classic-themes.min.css
221 ms
wcjp-frontend.css
216 ms
pum-site.min.css
230 ms
css
22 ms
995cccb5613c8a6786af52a3116aff1d.min.css
819 ms
jquery.min.js
406 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
391 ms
js
64 ms
index.js
346 ms
index.js
370 ms
wcjp-frontend.js
407 ms
core.min.js
519 ms
site.min.js
545 ms
mobile-detect.min.js
532 ms
awb-tabs-widget.js
572 ms
awb-vertical-menu-widget.js
604 ms
cssua.js
716 ms
modernizr.js
709 ms
fusion.js
710 ms
bootstrap.transition.js
767 ms
bootstrap.tooltip.js
944 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
1012 ms
jquery.easing.js
946 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1012 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1034 ms
jquery.ilightbox.js
1030 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
1038 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
1039 ms
jquery.fade.js
1127 ms
fusion-equal-heights.js
1146 ms
fusion-parallax.js
1228 ms
fusion-video-general.js
1213 ms
fusion-video-bg.js
1220 ms
fusion-lightbox.js
1223 ms
fusion-tooltip.js
1326 ms
fusion-sharing-box.js
1340 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
1249 ms
fusion-youtube.js
1226 ms
vimeoPlayer.js
1238 ms
avada-general-footer.js
1234 ms
avada-quantity.js
1321 ms
avada-crossfade-images.js
1186 ms
avada-select.js
1242 ms
avada-wpml.js
1236 ms
avada-contact-form-7.js
1214 ms
jquery.elasticslider.js
1177 ms
fusion-alert.js
1180 ms
awb-off-canvas.js
1185 ms
fusion-flexslider.js
1221 ms
fusion-animations.js
1214 ms
fusion-column-legacy.js
1163 ms
fusion-button.js
1083 ms
fusion-container.js
1274 ms
avada-elastic-slider.js
1242 ms
xmg_w_h175.png
187 ms
avada-drop-down.js
1100 ms
p-xmanager7-main-en.png
183 ms
xsh_w_h175.png
184 ms
p-xshell7-main-en.png
183 ms
xftp_w_h175.png
184 ms
p-xftp7-main-en.png
185 ms
xlp_w_h175-1.png
180 ms
p-xlpd7-main-en.png
186 ms
avada-to-top.js
1012 ms
avada-header.js
1030 ms
avada-menu.js
1010 ms
bootstrap.scrollspy.js
1119 ms
avada-scrollspy.js
1092 ms
fusion-responsive-typography.js
1120 ms
fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js
1083 ms
fusion-general-global.js
1133 ms
fusion-video.js
1118 ms
fusion-column.js
1200 ms
awb-icons.woff
1280 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1378 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1217 ms
ci-netsarang_header-1-1.svg
1190 ms
xmanager.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
xmanager.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xmanager.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xmanager.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xmanager.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xmanager.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xmanager. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: