Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

xmri.com

Second Opinion,Radiology Second Opinion, Teleradiology, Medical Second Opinion

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

508 ms

xmri.com screenshot

About Website

Visit xmri.com now to see the best up-to-date Xmri content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xmri.com

Need a second opinion? Look to the leader of online radiology second opinion from XMRI. Professional second opinion for radiology. Now patients can receive a second opinion over the internet in the pr...

Visit xmri.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xmri.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xmri.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,500 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xmri.com

88 ms

www.xmri.com

156 ms

template.min.css

22 ms

template_2018.css

17 ms

gotham_web_font_kit.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Xmri.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 8% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) relates to the external source Embed.tawk.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Xmri.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 794.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 61.8 kB

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 794.4 kB
  • After minification 786.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xmri images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 441.4 kB
  • After minification 441.4 kB
  • After compression 414.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 69.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xmri.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (52%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xmri. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xmri.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

xmri.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xmri.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xmri.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xmri.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xmri. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: