3 sec in total
88 ms
2.4 sec
508 ms
Visit xmri.com now to see the best up-to-date Xmri content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xmri.com
Need a second opinion? Look to the leader of online radiology second opinion from XMRI. Professional second opinion for radiology. Now patients can receive a second opinion over the internet in the pr...
Visit xmri.comWe analyzed Xmri.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xmri.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value7,500 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value28.4 s
0/100
10%
88 ms
156 ms
22 ms
17 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Xmri.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 8% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) relates to the external source Embed.tawk.to.
Page size can be reduced by 97.8 kB (7%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Xmri.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 794.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xmri images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xmri.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (52%)
87
42
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xmri. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xmri.com
88 ms
www.xmri.com
156 ms
template.min.css
22 ms
template_2018.css
17 ms
gotham_web_font_kit.css
20 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
slick.min.js
47 ms
slick.css
24 ms
slick-theme.css
22 ms
modal.css
28 ms
calendar-jos.min.css
30 ms
aicontactsafe_general.css
26 ms
profile_css_4.css
27 ms
mootools.js
50 ms
caption.min.js
33 ms
modal.min.js
29 ms
joomla.javascript.js
55 ms
calendar.js
45 ms
calendar-setup.min.js
49 ms
js
86 ms
js
240 ms
conversion.js
110 ms
hotjar-3484548.js
182 ms
uUZN4zum2ss
173 ms
JOK03ncwI1A
298 ms
Qe03YGqDvgM
317 ms
yiPTlrCsnzs
303 ms
logo-xmri-2023.png
149 ms
cart.png
13 ms
login.png
34 ms
2.jpg
149 ms
dn-wht.png
34 ms
step-1.png
144 ms
step-2.png
148 ms
step-3.png
148 ms
1.jpg
149 ms
2.jpg
149 ms
3.jpg
149 ms
4.jpg
150 ms
middle-3.jpg
152 ms
second-opinion.jpg
152 ms
mri.jpg
152 ms
ct.jpg
155 ms
mammography.jpg
151 ms
translation.jpg
152 ms
ultrasound.jpg
154 ms
xray.jpg
154 ms
interpretation.jpg
155 ms
peer-review.jpg
152 ms
consultation.jpg
153 ms
storage.jpg
163 ms
medical-logos.png
163 ms
as-seen-on.jpg
164 ms
phone.png
164 ms
147 ms
default
686 ms
left-s.png
50 ms
right-s.png
49 ms
ajax-loader.gif
61 ms
GothamSSm-Medium.otf
59 ms
GothamSSm-Bold.otf
69 ms
GothamSSm-Light.otf
72 ms
slick.woff
70 ms
www-player.css
68 ms
www-embed-player.js
67 ms
base.js
149 ms
modules.e4b2dc39f985f11fb1e4.js
43 ms
119 ms
ad_status.js
332 ms
YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js
117 ms
embed.js
73 ms
id
70 ms
Create
494 ms
Create
396 ms
Create
495 ms
Create
486 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
411 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
412 ms
index.php
432 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
432 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
432 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
634 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
601 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
593 ms
twk-main.js
441 ms
twk-vendor.js
518 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
442 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
460 ms
twk-runtime.js
461 ms
twk-app.js
484 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
GenerateIT
18 ms
GenerateIT
18 ms
GenerateIT
26 ms
index.php
62 ms
xmri.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xmri.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
xmri.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xmri.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xmri.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xmri.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xmri. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: