Tools & Wizards About Us
xnet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

xnet.com

XNet - Data Center, Cloud, Colocation Services | Chicago

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

531 ms

xnet.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing XNet content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xnet.com

Chicago area data center specializing in high-performance cloud services, colocation services, website and application hosting, and dedicated connectivity.

Visit xnet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xnet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xnet.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.248

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xnet.com

108 ms

www.xnet.com

906 ms

normalize.css

28 ms

ie8.css

47 ms

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Xnet.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Xnet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xnet.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 57.8 kB
  • After minification 56.4 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XNet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 48.0 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 43.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 84.6 kB
  • After minification 83.8 kB
  • After compression 77.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xnet.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XNet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xnet.com

xnet.com

108 ms

www.xnet.com

www.xnet.com

906 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

28 ms

ie8.css

ie8.css

47 ms

59 ms

css

css

22 ms

665 ms

icondemo.js

icondemo.js

51 ms

excanvas.js

excanvas.js

53 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

79 ms

jquery-easing-1.3.js

jquery-easing-1.3.js

68 ms

jquerytransit.js

jquerytransit.js

77 ms

css

css

22 ms

1510 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

22 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

27 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

33 ms

icomoon-fonts.css

icomoon-fonts.css

46 ms

jupiter-icons.css

jupiter-icons.css

50 ms

theme-styles.css

theme-styles.css

111 ms

responsive-theme.css

responsive-theme.css

74 ms

contact-us.png

contact-us.png

43 ms

about-bg.png

about-bg.png

43 ms

blog.png

blog.png

42 ms

cutomer-support.png

cutomer-support.png

43 ms

data-center.png

data-center.png

44 ms

why-xnet.png

why-xnet.png

66 ms

service.png

service.png

67 ms

our-customer.png

our-customer.png

67 ms

resources.png

resources.png

68 ms

xnet-logo2.png

xnet-logo2.png

67 ms

red-xnet1.jpg

red-xnet1.jpg

91 ms

withxnet1.jpg

withxnet1.jpg

119 ms

high-performance.png

high-performance.png

92 ms

intense-customisation.png

intense-customisation.png

94 ms

high-touch.png

high-touch.png

94 ms

dont-hiren.png

dont-hiren.png

118 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

25 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

25 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

26 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

27 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

26 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

106 ms

text-big-bg11.jpg

text-big-bg11.jpg

243 ms

text-big-bg2new.jpg

text-big-bg2new.jpg

273 ms

txt-bg-new-nnn.jpg

txt-bg-new-nnn.jpg

215 ms

sep-bg.png

sep-bg.png

58 ms

call-ico.png

call-ico.png

75 ms

email-us.png

email-us.png

74 ms

business-hours.png

business-hours.png

90 ms

ga.js

ga.js

12 ms

slddbg62.jpg

slddbg62.jpg

145 ms

raxjHiqOu8IVPmn7epZnDMyKBvHf5D6c4Pz-X3B3.ttf

raxjHiqOu8IVPmn7epZnDMyKBvHf5D6c4Pz-X3B3.ttf

25 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWA.ttf

26 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWA.ttf

26 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

skin.css

skin.css

28 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

Accessibility Review

xnet.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

xnet.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

xnet.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xnet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xnet.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

xnet.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XNet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: