Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

xpendy.com

Cancel your subscriptions easily and quickly | Xpendy

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

211 ms

xpendy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xpendy.com homepage info - get ready to check Xpendy best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about xpendy.com

Cancel your subscription with the click of a button: at Xpendy, it's possible! Download our free sample letter or let us send your cancellation notice. Quick & simple!

Visit xpendy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xpendy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xpendy.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,930 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xpendy.com

31 ms

28 ms

style.min.css

116 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

136 ms

woocommerce.css

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Xpendy.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Cdn-4.convertexperiments.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) belongs to the original domain Xpendy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 74.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

274.1 kB

After Optimization

199.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Xpendy.com main page is 274.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 93.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 71.6 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.8 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 32.9 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xpendy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 29 B

  • Original 93.5 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB
  • After compression 93.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 821 B

  • Original 65.3 kB
  • After minification 65.3 kB
  • After compression 64.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xpendy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xpendy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xpendy.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

xpendy.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xpendy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Xpendy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xpendy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: