1.1 sec in total
34 ms
543 ms
546 ms
Visit xposeprotocol.com now to see the best up-to-date Xposeprotocol content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xposeprotocol.com
Visit xposeprotocol.comWe analyzed Xposeprotocol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
xposeprotocol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.319
36/100
15%
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
34 ms
56 ms
36 ms
48 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Xposeprotocol.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (296 ms) belongs to the original domain Xposeprotocol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 193.2 kB (19%)
1.0 MB
842.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Xposeprotocol.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 855.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xposeprotocol needs image optimization as it can save up to 129.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (44%)
52
29
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xposeprotocol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xposeprotocol.com
34 ms
xposeprotocol.com
56 ms
css
36 ms
css
48 ms
css
52 ms
fontawesome.min.css
35 ms
bootstrap.css
61 ms
animate.css
55 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
54 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
46 ms
slick.css
58 ms
style.css
72 ms
responsive.css
79 ms
jquery.min.js
102 ms
circle-progress.js
98 ms
bootstrap.min.js
67 ms
onpagescroll.js
97 ms
wow.min.js
95 ms
jquery.countdown.js
94 ms
owl.carousel.js
95 ms
slick.min.js
98 ms
Chart.js
171 ms
chart-function.js
96 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
194 ms
script.js
194 ms
particles.js
169 ms
gold-app.js
168 ms
logo.png
156 ms
dark-logo.png
105 ms
banner-5.jpg
157 ms
platinum-move-1.png
157 ms
platinum-move-2.png
158 ms
platinum-move-3.png
155 ms
coin-bg-icon.png
157 ms
gold-animation-icon.png
159 ms
platinum-waves.png
159 ms
platinum-base.png
160 ms
platinum-base-line.png
159 ms
platinum-top-lines.png
160 ms
about-img-1.png
184 ms
benefit-icon-1.png
184 ms
benefit-icon-2.png
183 ms
benefit-icon-5.png
184 ms
benefit-icon-3.png
183 ms
benefit-icon-6.png
183 ms
large-c-icon.png
228 ms
bg-5.png
229 ms
bg-4.png
228 ms
line2.png
209 ms
team-thumb.jpg
226 ms
team-thumb3.jpg
226 ms
team-thumb4.jpg
243 ms
team-thumb5.jpg
296 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
114 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf
134 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
135 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
151 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
151 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
149 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
150 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
150 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
225 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
250 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
236 ms
question-img.png
98 ms
question-img-rev.png
117 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
24 ms
xposeprotocol.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
xposeprotocol.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xposeprotocol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Xposeprotocol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xposeprotocol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xposeprotocol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: