583 ms in total
48 ms
475 ms
60 ms
Click here to check amazing Xpress content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xpress.ooo
Domain Registration, Business Email, Web Hosting, VPS, Cloud Hosting, Google Workspace, Web Security
Visit xpress.oooWe analyzed Xpress.ooo page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 535 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
xpress.ooo performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
48 ms
29 ms
63 ms
64 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xpress.ooo, 45% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (244 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 669.5 kB (60%)
1.1 MB
441.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Xpress.ooo main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 797.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 648.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 648.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xpress needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)
25
15
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.xpress.ooo
48 ms
minified.js
29 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
63 ms
polyfill.min.js
64 ms
thunderbolt-commons.81e79c4a.bundle.min.js
119 ms
main.e8bb44c8.bundle.min.js
116 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
115 ms
lodash.min.js
122 ms
react.production.min.js
119 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
122 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
118 ms
c837a6_2119733e838e4a2f8813ebde736f99d5~mv2.jpg
68 ms
bundle.min.js
61 ms
c837a6_eb322a4179e54d788eef6896e67f05d0~mv2.jpg
35 ms
c837a6_41aece62e57346379d12018aece18ea2~mv2.jpg
35 ms
c837a6_d11c6c437c0f4feb9de8591b42ead168~mv2.jpg
35 ms
Acronis_edited.png
217 ms
KM%20logo_edited.png
192 ms
Imperva_logo_(color)_edited.png
244 ms
Ingram_micro_logo_edited.png
193 ms
c837a6_0f9a4576e86442e3b124952322acdd72~mv2.jpg
36 ms
c837a6_159e86d4444649fcada7bff77ae670adf000.png
36 ms
124 ms
119 ms
117 ms
118 ms
113 ms
114 ms
156 ms
152 ms
153 ms
150 ms
147 ms
149 ms
p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff
4 ms
h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
12 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
13 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
13 ms
aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
11 ms
9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
11 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
20 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
15 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
7 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
7 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
3 ms
xpress.ooo accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xpress.ooo best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xpress.ooo SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xpress.ooo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xpress.ooo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xpress.ooo
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: