Tools & Wizards About Us
xradia.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

xradia.com

Vulkan Vegas Casino | Best Review bonuses spins | VulkanVegas on the mobile app

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

227 ms

xradia.com screenshot

About Website

Visit xradia.com now to see the best up-to-date Xradia content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xradia.com

Online casino Vulkan Vegas for quick wins in the mobile application. Simple registration in Vulkan Vegas. Kampanjkod: WORLDCASINO

Visit xradia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xradia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xradia.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,300 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.234

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.xradia.com

1267 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

272 ms

jrsm.css

121 ms

prettyPhoto.css

301 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Xradia.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Munchkin.marketo.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Xradia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 677.0 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

397.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xradia.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 447.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 53.0 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 149.1 kB
  • After minification 142.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xradia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 300.9 kB

  • Original 447.6 kB
  • After minification 407.1 kB
  • After compression 146.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 300.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 325.4 kB

  • Original 424.6 kB
  • After minification 401.2 kB
  • After compression 99.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xradia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (78%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xradia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.xradia.com

www.xradia.com

1267 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

272 ms

jrsm.css

jrsm.css

121 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

301 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

wp-video-lightbox.css

174 ms

css

css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

374 ms

shiftnav.css

shiftnav.css

307 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

364 ms

standard-dark.css

standard-dark.css

293 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

375 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

316 ms

font.css

font.css

600 ms

default.css

default.css

380 ms

wp-ui.css

wp-ui.css

465 ms

wpui-light.css

wpui-light.css

403 ms

css.php

css.php

783 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

624 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

468 ms

jrsm-jquery.js

jrsm-jquery.js

477 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

598 ms

video-lightbox.js

video-lightbox.js

536 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

551 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

614 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

625 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

658 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

663 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

733 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

703 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

697 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

717 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

738 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

827 ms

www.xradia.com

www.xradia.com

1288 ms

wp-ui.js

wp-ui.js

821 ms

gallery.js

gallery.js

821 ms

colorbox.js

colorbox.js

874 ms

vslider.js

vslider.js

796 ms

jquery.orbit-1.3.0.min.js

jquery.orbit-1.3.0.min.js

726 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

666 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

687 ms

shiftnav.js

shiftnav.js

667 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

638 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

303 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

302 ms

logo-image.png

logo-image.png

291 ms

DCT_banner_index.jpg

DCT_banner_index.jpg

491 ms

link_black.gif

link_black.gif

290 ms

social-icons.png

social-icons.png

289 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

110 ms

0bff5a93-ce9b-4468-9a94-431fb03301d0.woff

0bff5a93-ce9b-4468-9a94-431fb03301d0.woff

208 ms

5beb2de5-f02e-4d93-95f9-8dae06b289d8.woff

5beb2de5-f02e-4d93-95f9-8dae06b289d8.woff

292 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

238 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

4 ms

visitWebPage

visitWebPage

83 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

48 ms

smartphones-p-l.css

smartphones-p-l.css

688 ms

smartphones-landscape.css

smartphones-landscape.css

748 ms

iphone.css

iphone.css

809 ms

tablets.css

tablets.css

699 ms

Accessibility Review

xradia.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

xradia.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xradia.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xradia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xradia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xradia.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xradia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: