3.6 sec in total
92 ms
3 sec
577 ms
Welcome to xros.co homepage info - get ready to check Xros best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about xros.co
Communicate in real-time with the people you work with, clients, partners, suppliers, consultants, investors... anyone!
Visit xros.coWe analyzed Xros.co page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
xros.co performance score
92 ms
38 ms
89 ms
63 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Xros.co, 49% (35 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (19 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (55%)
4.3 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Xros.co main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xros images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xros.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (72%)
64
18
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xros. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xros.co
92 ms
www.xros.co
38 ms
bt
89 ms
require.min.js
63 ms
main-r.min.js
70 ms
viewer.css
63 ms
dynamicmodel
17 ms
0a14e6_4d40887cb4e1ffcf5d4e130dee37b22b_686.json.z
641 ms
0a14e6_262715a1990e10e8ad99cfea60ace21a_686.json.z
425 ms
ugc-viewer
42 ms
bt
137 ms
skins.min.js
130 ms
components.min.js
123 ms
utils.min.js
59 ms
core.min.js
123 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
122 ms
lodash.min.js
123 ms
TweenMax.min.js
123 ms
layout.min.js
385 ms
tpa.min.js
383 ms
fonts.min.js
384 ms
animations.min.js
382 ms
swfobject.min.js
382 ms
mousetrap.min.js
381 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
382 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
385 ms
react-dom.min.js
382 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
384 ms
widgets.min.js
381 ms
experiment.js
381 ms
render.min.js
383 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
389 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
390 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
387 ms
zepto.min.js
385 ms
color.min.js
385 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
241 ms
bt
188 ms
bt
622 ms
dc.js
631 ms
e316f544f9094143b9eac01f1f19e697.png
454 ms
css
200 ms
hebrew.css
195 ms
arabic.css
195 ms
latin.css
196 ms
9c4b521dd2404cd5a05ed6115f3a0dc8.png
219 ms
0a14e6_e6d7154e971e4a869ad775c12e4eb9b6.png
485 ms
0a14e6_cf9d3c9b5c9042139e9ff21d7ee0ca99.png
505 ms
0a14e6_2ebce983839a4fab943ce00de8d7fb4a.png
537 ms
1d354fa48af849af9ba1a1d7b9162174.jpg
500 ms
f2809273217b4054ba63a83248c6340f.jpg
670 ms
f5acf43afedb27d9714ef43383e7a782.jpg
745 ms
d3e7218a6c4d49a5a019ec1ac9c21499.jpg
754 ms
0a14e6_27d823e67cb64c5a9f02827898d2895a.png
728 ms
0a14e6_a5c1c833cc524527905f347c2e1021b3.png
707 ms
0a14e6_c37ef5d180344027bc955b839b504b0e.png
1065 ms
0a14e6_27a68985f923465d99390f4e6fa1e846.png
917 ms
0a14e6_19a8fb38d2894a27afd65675ca4d6fc9.png
948 ms
0a14e6_78717aed0bc34335a39b76c9f8873262.png
998 ms
0a14e6_60f675f32c384142b65d3af2a0a1b2d3.png
876 ms
bt
495 ms
bt
495 ms
bt
534 ms
__utm.gif
304 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
282 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
284 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
283 ms
WxzDAY6mC9v3znSJEtCoW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
281 ms
0a14e6_60f675f32c384142b65d3af2a0a1b2d3.png
1036 ms
5t8vP9Hx2udzw372glmOxA.ttf
253 ms
ugc-viewer
58 ms
ga-audiences
64 ms
xros.co SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xros.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Xros.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xros.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xros. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: