4.4 sec in total
197 ms
2 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to xrt.com homepage info - get ready to check Xrt best content right away, or after learning these important things about xrt.com
Accompagnez la croissance de votre entreprise avec Sage. Découvrez les logiciels et solutions de gestion Sage adaptés à vos besoins.
Visit xrt.comWe analyzed Xrt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
xrt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value23.6 s
0/100
25%
Value13.4 s
2/100
10%
Value20,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value29.8 s
0/100
10%
197 ms
837 ms
123 ms
61 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Xrt.com, 20% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.sage.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Tags.tiqcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) relates to the external source Sage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 223.0 kB (49%)
455.4 kB
232.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Xrt.com main page is 455.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 252.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 201.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 201.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xrt.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)
22
7
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xrt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fr-fr
197 ms
837 ms
main.css
123 ms
utag.sync.js
61 ms
VisitorIdentification.js
61 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
37 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
34 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js
40 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js
222 ms
form.validate.js
228 ms
form.tracking.js
223 ms
form.conditions.js
225 ms
rantandrave.js
224 ms
formsextensions.validate.js
225 ms
require.settings.js
225 ms
SageDotCom.bundle.config.js
222 ms
require.js
223 ms
554 ms
sage-logo-green.svg
106 ms
pencil.svg
109 ms
Sage_Text-Regular.woff
357 ms
Sage_Text-Medium.woff
357 ms
Sage_Text-Light.woff
358 ms
Sage_Text-Bold.woff
357 ms
Sage-UI-Icons.woff
357 ms
Sage_Headline-Black.woff
357 ms
image-sprites-social-icons.svg
78 ms
invisible.js
90 ms
SageDotCom.bundle.js
316 ms
7529d090cc2d802a
80 ms
xrt.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xrt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
xrt.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xrt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xrt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xrt.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xrt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: