11.9 sec in total
406 ms
9.1 sec
2.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Xsign content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xsign.com
xsign is a UK based signage company, exporting globally. We design, manufacture and install signs, using our patented product range.
Visit xsign.comWe analyzed Xsign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
xsign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.9 s
0/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value21.6 s
0/100
10%
Value22,800 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value35.5 s
0/100
10%
406 ms
324 ms
242 ms
246 ms
249 ms
Our browser made a total of 130 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Xsign.com, 10% (13 requests) were made to Onefoursix-dev.co.uk and 4% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Xsign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.8 kB (6%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Xsign.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xsign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 399 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (75%)
101
25
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xsign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xsign.com
406 ms
bootstrap.min.css
324 ms
style.min.css
242 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
246 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
249 ms
views-frontend.css
251 ms
eae.min.css
402 ms
v4-shims.min.css
490 ms
all.min.css
485 ms
vegas.min.css
495 ms
all.min.css
589 ms
bootstrap.min.css
579 ms
front.css
641 ms
style.css
734 ms
dashicons.min.css
816 ms
genericons.css
822 ms
font-awesome.min.css
824 ms
all.min.css
835 ms
style.min.css
884 ms
theme.min.css
975 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1057 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
1066 ms
frontend.min.css
1152 ms
post-36.css
1072 ms
frontend.min.css
1226 ms
global.css
1251 ms
post-14.css
1305 ms
post-35.css
1309 ms
post-48.css
1345 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1423 ms
solid.min.css
1472 ms
brands.min.css
1475 ms
toolset-common-es-frontend.js
1546 ms
jquery.min.js
1640 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1587 ms
popper.min.js
1661 ms
pir8uhv.css
158 ms
css
25 ms
api.js
31 ms
animations.min.css
1643 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1558 ms
front.js
1545 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
1729 ms
eae.min.js
1665 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1646 ms
animated-main.min.js
1574 ms
particles.min.js
1902 ms
magnific.min.js
1903 ms
vegas.min.js
1975 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1888 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1866 ms
hooks.min.js
1923 ms
i18n.min.js
1905 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1834 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1901 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1900 ms
public.js
1894 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1925 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1982 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1900 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1972 ms
frontend.min.js
1968 ms
waypoints.min.js
1877 ms
core.min.js
1872 ms
swiper.min.js
2037 ms
share-link.min.js
1893 ms
dialog.min.js
1968 ms
frontend.min.js
1933 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1941 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1896 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1958 ms
lazyload.min.js
1967 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
fbevents.js
66 ms
p.css
197 ms
identity.js
9 ms
2443589962438137
275 ms
collect
39 ms
collect
422 ms
Interior-Signs-2.jpg
379 ms
Exterior-Signs.jpg
345 ms
Graphic-Signs-1.jpg
345 ms
Inclusive-Signs-1.jpg
345 ms
Office-Signs-2.jpg
345 ms
Talky-Signs.jpg
345 ms
Hospital-Signs-225x150.jpg
348 ms
Office-Signs-1-225x150.jpg
348 ms
University-Signs-225x150.jpg
348 ms
Leisure-Centre-and-Hotel-Signs-225x150.jpg
348 ms
Residential-Signs-225x150.jpg
348 ms
School-Signs-225x150.jpg
348 ms
Wayfinding-Signs-1-225x150.jpg
354 ms
Architectural-Spaces.jpg
1505 ms
Interior-Signs.jpg
1523 ms
Exterior-Signs.jpg
1609 ms
Products.jpg
1690 ms
New-background.jpg
1687 ms
Architectural-Background.jpg
1751 ms
Vita-Student-Leeds.jpg
1947 ms
d
284 ms
d
325 ms
d
319 ms
d
322 ms
wARDj0u
79 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1963 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2023 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
2130 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1706 ms
ga-audiences
96 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
1744 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1933 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2047 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2112 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
2115 ms
eicons.woff
2115 ms
recaptcha__en.js
63 ms
cropped-Web-Logo-2.png
1141 ms
4-Wellington-Place-20220518-25.jpg
1390 ms
Northstowe-School-1024x1024.jpg
1601 ms
Rowan-View2.jpg
1435 ms
untitled-20220518-229.jpg
1554 ms
Hotel-LaTour-20220419-50.jpg
1671 ms
One-Colemore-Row-1024x1024.jpg
1726 ms
Keele-University-1024x1024.jpg
1873 ms
Brambles-Primary-School-20220518-47.jpg
1981 ms
Glebe-Farm-School4.jpg
1964 ms
UCLH-Phase-4-20201202-11.jpg
2094 ms
Broadmarsh-Car-Park-20211103-20.jpg
2152 ms
Vita-Student-Birmingham-20190912-41.jpg
2116 ms
openbridge_plugin.js
413 ms
xsign.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xsign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xsign.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xsign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xsign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xsign.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xsign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: