Tools & Wizards About Us
xvidepos.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

xvidepos.com

Page Load Speed

665 ms in total

First Response

247 ms

Resources Loaded

360 ms

Page Rendered

58 ms

xvidepos.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xvidepos.com homepage info - get ready to check Xvidepos best content right away, or after learning these important things about xvidepos.com

Visit xvidepos.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xvidepos.com page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 418 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xvidepos.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xvidepos.com

247 ms

ww25.xvidepos.com

109 ms

bmfwiLpat.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xvidepos.com, 67% (2 requests) were made to Ww25.xvidepos.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (247 ms) belongs to the original domain Xvidepos.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

66.6 kB

After Optimization

60.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Xvidepos.com main page is 66.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 65.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 348 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 827 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 348 B or 30% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 65.4 kB
  • After minification 65.4 kB
  • After compression 59.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xvidepos. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

xvidepos.com

xvidepos.com

247 ms

ww25.xvidepos.com

ww25.xvidepos.com

109 ms

bmfwiLpat.js

bmfwiLpat.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

xvidepos.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

xvidepos.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

xvidepos.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xvidepos.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Xvidepos.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xvidepos.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xvidepos. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: