1.8 sec in total
293 ms
1.3 sec
159 ms
Visit xwork.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Xwork content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xwork.co.uk
Visit xwork.co.ukWe analyzed Xwork.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
xwork.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.3 s
43/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
293 ms
86 ms
163 ms
354 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Xwork.co.uk, 21% (7 requests) were made to Galcdn.datingfactory.net and 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (354 ms) belongs to the original domain Xwork.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 235.1 kB (31%)
751.0 kB
516.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Xwork.co.uk main page is 751.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 415.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xwork images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 208.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (39%)
31
19
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xwork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
xwork.co.uk
293 ms
index.common.css
86 ms
index.css
163 ms
df.js
354 ms
theme.js
165 ms
Index.js
165 ms
2ca212f0df613508643fede5adeaf81c.png
267 ms
066ee71347f7cdaed1d3bbc8aad2d1d4.png
275 ms
38980512b44eee90315877086c699a22.png
224 ms
573ec0042d2b58e7470f96d5e489cff1.png
276 ms
1f11428497038f39243648f3d8353635.png
275 ms
f037edf61685f0792c3ba7c00375c38c.png
276 ms
64f2ef182853ce01b5bca2793faef8a0.png
291 ms
visual.jpg
241 ms
logo.png
86 ms
SwitchLocale.js
79 ms
selector_arrow_bottom.gif
84 ms
RegistrationSimple.js
79 ms
jquery.select.behavior.js
80 ms
bgreg.png
115 ms
ico_warning.gif
115 ms
button.png
115 ms
bgtitle.png
117 ms
bgtopmedia.png
115 ms
bgmiddlemedia.png
159 ms
bgbottommedia.png
158 ms
ga.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
icon_auth.png
82 ms
providers.gif
81 ms
ajs.php
242 ms
collect
57 ms
xwork.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
xwork.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xwork.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xwork.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xwork.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xwork.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xwork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: