1.8 sec in total
111 ms
1.5 sec
106 ms
Welcome to wichita.younglife.org homepage info - get ready to check Wichita Young Life best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wichita.younglife.org
Visit wichita.younglife.orgWe analyzed Wichita.younglife.org page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
wichita.younglife.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
88/100
10%
111 ms
514 ms
34 ms
94 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Wichita.younglife.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) belongs to the original domain Wichita.younglife.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)
1.9 MB
634.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Wichita.younglife.org main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 912.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wichita Young Life images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 713.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 713.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 428.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wichita.younglife.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 428.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (66%)
50
17
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wichita Young Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wichita.younglife.org
111 ms
default.aspx
514 ms
font-awesome.min.css
34 ms
bootstrap.css
94 ms
bootstrap-custom.css
167 ms
SP10Bootstrap3Fixes.css
168 ms
controls.css
175 ms
Menu.css
163 ms
page-layouts-21.css
172 ms
rca.css
177 ms
corev4.css
301 ms
mSites_3-16-16.css
257 ms
BlueGreen.css
215 ms
jquery.tinyscrollbar.min.js
219 ms
entityeditor.ie9fix.js
218 ms
WebResource.axd
227 ms
blank.js
260 ms
jquery1.9.1.min.js
101 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
54 ms
jquery-ui.js
277 ms
yl.publishing.edit.image.js
53 ms
bootstrap.min.js
51 ms
bootstrap-custom.js
52 ms
jquery-textfill-0.1.js
123 ms
msites_7-31-15.js
99 ms
videomodal.js
123 ms
ie11.js
122 ms
yl.controller.js
145 ms
init.js
199 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
153 ms
ScriptResource.axd
193 ms
ScriptResource.axd
151 ms
fgimg.png
66 ms
bgximg.png
65 ms
HeaderBg.png
65 ms
YounglifeLogo.png
60 ms
SearchButton.png
56 ms
YLVS%20Camp%202011.JPG
199 ms
Capernaum%20Camp%202012%20-%20banquet.JPG
131 ms
Capernaum%20Camp%202012%20-%20volleyball.JPG
160 ms
Collegiate%20camp%20-%20boys.JPG
186 ms
Collegiate%20-%20girls.jpg
197 ms
Independent%20Fall%202012.jpg
190 ms
MoreIcon.png
180 ms
ylbg-scrollbar-track-y.png
210 ms
ylbg-scrollbar-trackend-y.png
228 ms
ylbg-scrollbar-thumb-y-top.png
238 ms
ylbg-scrollbar-thumb-y-end.png
243 ms
OrangeSquareBullet.png
245 ms
GivingWebPartBg.png
249 ms
GivingWebPartSpacer.png
256 ms
FooterYLLogo.png
274 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4 ms
wichita.younglife.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wichita.younglife.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
wichita.younglife.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wichita.younglife.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wichita.younglife.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wichita.younglife.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wichita Young Life. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: