3.4 sec in total
598 ms
1.8 sec
994 ms
Visit yalla.team now to see the best up-to-date Yalla content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about yalla.team
Get task management, client collaboration, team chat, project timelines, & more in one easy-to-use online software. Perfect for remote teams.
Visit yalla.teamWe analyzed Yalla.team page load time and found that the first response time was 598 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
yalla.team performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value2,020 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
598 ms
46 ms
23 ms
29 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Yalla.team, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (598 ms) belongs to the original domain Yalla.team.
Page size can be reduced by 364.4 kB (18%)
2.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Yalla.team main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Yalla needs image optimization as it can save up to 180.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 114.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 114.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 564 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yalla.team has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (49%)
53
27
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yalla. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
yalla.team
598 ms
classic-themes.min.css
46 ms
bootstrap-utilities.min.css
23 ms
all.min.css
29 ms
flatsome.css
101 ms
style.css
71 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
75 ms
xgrpobaslk.jsonp
22 ms
E-v1.js
31 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
59 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
60 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
74 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
80 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
98 ms
flatsome.js
222 ms
heap-716012134.js
302 ms
gtm.js
187 ms
logo.png
113 ms
swatch
156 ms
white-logo.png
146 ms
sign-up-free-btn.png
261 ms
yalla-user-board.png
311 ms
multiple-apps-in-one-1024x715.png
263 ms
yalla-user-board-activity.png
313 ms
yalla-company.png
311 ms
salavation.png
183 ms
purdue.png
211 ms
lamar.png
262 ms
instapage.png
264 ms
pwc.png
310 ms
stanford.png
310 ms
dropbox.png
310 ms
freshbooks.png
315 ms
homeland.png
312 ms
kodak.png
314 ms
adobe.png
315 ms
byu.png
313 ms
call-tracking.png
341 ms
centrex.png
338 ms
delta.png
339 ms
loader
117 ms
widget.js
244 ms
wistia-mux.js
43 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
202 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
203 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
204 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
204 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
205 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
204 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
226 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
243 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
244 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
244 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
243 ms
font
242 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
242 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
286 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff
286 ms
fl-icons.ttf
282 ms
flashPlayer.js
29 ms
analytics.js
80 ms
7076608d0960a4911fcd558ad3c852e9
60 ms
linkid.js
32 ms
h
56 ms
widget_app_base_1709553975535.js
54 ms
collect
66 ms
collect
90 ms
js
74 ms
chunk.countup.js
27 ms
chunk.sticky-sidebar.js
102 ms
yalla.team accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
yalla.team best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
yalla.team SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yalla.team can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yalla.team main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yalla.team
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Yalla. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: