5.5 sec in total
28 ms
5.2 sec
296 ms
Visit yatel.in now to see the best up-to-date Yatel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about yatel.in
Yatel IT Solutions: Website Design| Website Development | Website Development Company Chennai India | Multivendor | Multivendor Marketplace| Portal development | Ecommerce | Ecommerce Web Development ...
Visit yatel.inWe analyzed Yatel.in page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
yatel.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
28 ms
689 ms
32 ms
449 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Yatel.in, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Yatel.in.
Page size can be reduced by 604.3 kB (16%)
3.8 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Yatel.in main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 361.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Yatel needs image optimization as it can save up to 361.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 163.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.7 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yatel.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)
57
35
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yatel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
yatel.in
28 ms
yatel.in
689 ms
css
32 ms
font-awesome.min.css
449 ms
animate.css
465 ms
prettyPhoto.css
454 ms
slick.css
457 ms
settings.css
460 ms
style.css
652 ms
responsive.css
894 ms
default.css
914 ms
logo.png
899 ms
dummy.png
893 ms
devices.png
693 ms
2.jpg
892 ms
c.jpg
1128 ms
3.jpg
1130 ms
4.jpg
1135 ms
4.jpg
1136 ms
6.jpg
1161 ms
10.jpg
1337 ms
1.jpg
1577 ms
3.jpg
1578 ms
7.jpg
1578 ms
client-1.png
1584 ms
client-2.png
1597 ms
client-3.png
1795 ms
page.php
64 ms
email-decode.min.js
1578 ms
js
56 ms
jquery.min.js
2018 ms
waypoints.min.js
2027 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2028 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2037 ms
jquery.animateNumber.min.js
2038 ms
slick.min.js
2242 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
2456 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
2459 ms
jquery.sharrre.min.js
2465 ms
jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js
2474 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
2476 ms
pfs3shRYZOH.css
16 ms
script.js
2451 ms
client-4.png
2657 ms
client-5.png
2662 ms
client-6.png
2658 ms
client-7.png
2668 ms
client-8.png
2482 ms
client-9.png
2448 ms
client-10.png
2660 ms
client-11.png
2657 ms
client-17.jpg
2658 ms
logo-white.html
2594 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
22 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
27 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
41 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
49 ms
fontawesome-webfont862f862f.html
2478 ms
block-bg-2.jpg
2452 ms
loader.html
1020 ms
timer.html
1016 ms
04.jpg
1024 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1039 ms
fontawesome-webfont862f862f.ttf
1087 ms
yatel.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
yatel.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
yatel.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yatel.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Yatel.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yatel.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Yatel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: