7.6 sec in total
1.7 sec
3.5 sec
2.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Yellowfiber content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about yellowfiber.net
365 Data Centers delivers leading hybrid and edge data center solutions in 20 strategic markets and operates a nationwide fiber network with 125 points-of-presence nationwide.
Visit yellowfiber.netWe analyzed Yellowfiber.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
yellowfiber.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value1.1 s
100/100
25%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.275
44/100
15%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
1689 ms
54 ms
59 ms
56 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Yellowfiber.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Yellowfiber.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (31%)
3.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Yellowfiber.net main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Yellowfiber images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 584.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 584.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 335.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yellowfiber.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 335.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (65%)
81
28
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yellowfiber. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
yellowfiber.net
1689 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
54 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
59 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
56 ms
flexslider.css
75 ms
ut.portfolio.style.css
71 ms
prettyPhoto.css
116 ms
font-awesome.css
111 ms
ut-responsive-grid.css
117 ms
ut.table.style.css
110 ms
ut.animate.css
122 ms
ut.elastislide.css
120 ms
ut.fancyrotator.css
123 ms
ut.shortcode.css
124 ms
ut.twitter.css
125 ms
styles.css
120 ms
settings.css
123 ms
ut-fontface.css
128 ms
css
138 ms
css
142 ms
css
149 ms
ut-superfish.css
127 ms
style.css
127 ms
jquery.js
139 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
138 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
138 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
137 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
130 ms
jquery.lazy.load.js
130 ms
modernizr.min.js
191 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
212 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
214 ms
external-tracking.min.js
214 ms
jquery.form.min.js
130 ms
scripts.js
206 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
259 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
259 ms
tabs.collapse.min.js
256 ms
jquery.visible.min.js
256 ms
api.js
261 ms
jquery.appear.js
254 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
248 ms
ut.scplugin.js
245 ms
toucheffects.min.js
235 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
235 ms
superfish.min.js
215 ms
retina.min.js
190 ms
ut-videoplayer.js
188 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
186 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
184 ms
ut-init.js
181 ms
wp-embed.min.js
177 ms
analytics.js
140 ms
YellowFiber_transparentlogoyellow.png
59 ms
yellowfiber_front_team.jpg
123 ms
overlay-pattern.png
61 ms
top10clients_black_ver2.png
62 ms
internet_yellow.jpg
63 ms
cloud_yellow.jpg
122 ms
voip_yellow.jpg
63 ms
managedservices_yellow.jpg
123 ms
MPLS_yellow.jpg
124 ms
networksecurity_yellow.jpg
125 ms
businesslaptop.png
130 ms
afge1-w200h200.png
125 ms
destinationdc-w200h200.png
129 ms
virginiaheart-w200h200.png
128 ms
prosynthesislabinc_black-w200h200.jpg
128 ms
divider.png
92 ms
metro.jpg
96 ms
lightfiber.gif
397 ms
twitterfeed.jpg
97 ms
raleway-semibold-webfont.woff
69 ms
collect
33 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.woff
25 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
114 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
110 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.woff
105 ms
collect
213 ms
ga-audiences
22 ms
WidgetScript
1081 ms
1863454.js
852 ms
recaptcha__en.js
875 ms
collect
823 ms
ajax-loader.gif
76 ms
yellowfiber.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
yellowfiber.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
yellowfiber.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yellowfiber.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yellowfiber.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yellowfiber.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Yellowfiber. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: