Tools & Wizards About Us
yeskey.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

yeskey.com

Website is Maintaining, please visit later!

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

81 ms

yeskey.com screenshot

About Website

Visit yeskey.com now to see the best up-to-date Yeskey content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about yeskey.com

Visit yeskey.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Yeskey.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

yeskey.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.yeskey.com

1602 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Yeskey.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Yeskey.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 284.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

916.1 kB

After Optimization

632.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Yeskey.com main page is 916.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 690.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 400 B
  • After minification 394 B
  • After compression 274 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126 B or 32% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 690.5 kB
  • After minification 568.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Yeskey needs image optimization as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 140.7 kB

  • Original 199.0 kB
  • After minification 193.7 kB
  • After compression 58.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yeskey.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

www.yeskey.com

www.yeskey.com

1602 ms

Accessibility Review

yeskey.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

yeskey.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

yeskey.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yeskey.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Yeskey.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

yeskey.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Yeskey. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: