2.3 sec in total
180 ms
1.9 sec
236 ms
Welcome to antiaging.zealforlife.com homepage info - get ready to check Antiaging Zealforlife best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about antiaging.zealforlife.com
Visit antiaging.zealforlife.comWe analyzed Antiaging.zealforlife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
antiaging.zealforlife.com performance score
180 ms
192 ms
45 ms
97 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Antiaging.zealforlife.com, 65% (53 requests) were made to Zurvita.com and 16% (13 requests) were made to Portalvhdsvxvs8608mhw0h.blob.core.windows.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (705 ms) relates to the external source Portalvhdsvxvs8608mhw0h.blob.core.windows.net.
Page size can be reduced by 711.8 kB (35%)
2.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Antiaging.zealforlife.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 968.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antiaging Zealforlife images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 398.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.8 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 282.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antiaging.zealforlife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 282.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (74%)
69
18
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antiaging Zealforlife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
antiaging.zealforlife.com
180 ms
antiaging.zurvita.com
192 ms
45 ms
97 ms
197 ms
152 ms
jquery.wowwindow.css
92 ms
bootstrap.css
207 ms
font-awesome.min.css
171 ms
notifications.css
131 ms
admintoolbar.css
136 ms
layout.css
133 ms
responsive.css
134 ms
style.css
172 ms
custom.css
174 ms
layout-theme.css
176 ms
bootstrap-web.css
174 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
210 ms
styles.css
210 ms
css
76 ms
css
88 ms
jquery.js
292 ms
underscore-min.js
180 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.js
221 ms
jquery.titlealert.js
206 ms
browserdetect.js
210 ms
bootstrap.min.js
211 ms
smartnotification.js
220 ms
core2.js
247 ms
jquery.blockui.min.js
250 ms
jquery.easing.js
252 ms
jquery.viewport.mini.js
264 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
264 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
286 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
289 ms
scripts.js
289 ms
framework.js
293 ms
animate.min.css
214 ms
widgets.css
213 ms
shortcodes.css
235 ms
2016_ZURVITA_FRONTEND_LOGO_6800.png
295 ms
iwa88wlt01
245 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_FOCUS_BG_6788.jpg
487 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_FOCUS_FG_6789.png
405 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_ENERGY_BG_6786.jpg
705 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_ENERGY_FG_6787.png
486 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_HEALTH_BG_6790.jpg
495 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_HEALTH_FG_6791.png
486 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_ZEAL_ON_BG_6798.jpg
599 ms
2016_HOME_SLIDER_ZEAL_ON_FG_6793.png
552 ms
2016_HOME_PRODUCTS_CTA_6802.jpg
652 ms
2016_HOME_ENROLL_CTA_6851.jpg
604 ms
2016_ZURVITA_FOOTER_LOGO_6795.png
550 ms
2016_DSA_LOGO_6785.png
600 ms
us.png
60 ms
au.png
59 ms
at.png
58 ms
be.png
57 ms
ca.png
56 ms
dk.png
56 ms
do.png
141 ms
fi.png
141 ms
de.png
140 ms
hk.png
139 ms
hu.png
139 ms
ie.png
139 ms
nl.png
187 ms
pr.png
187 ms
sg.png
186 ms
se.png
186 ms
gb.png
185 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
73 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
74 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
117 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
115 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
116 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
124 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
244 ms
analytics.js
91 ms
collect
11 ms
E-v1.js
167 ms
iframe_shim
49 ms
antiaging.zealforlife.com SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antiaging.zealforlife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Antiaging.zealforlife.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
antiaging.zealforlife.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Antiaging Zealforlife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: