Tools & Wizards About Us
partner.zipping.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

partner.zipping.in

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

461 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

179 ms

partner.zipping.in screenshot

About Website

Visit partner.zipping.in now to see the best up-to-date Partner Zipping content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about partner.zipping.in

Zipping Logistic is a Courier Service provider for eCommerce shipping at lowest rates with COD-Cash on Delivery and prepaid courier services in India

Visit partner.zipping.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Partner.zipping.in page load time and found that the first response time was 461 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

partner.zipping.in performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,820 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

partner.zipping.in

461 ms

login

465 ms

fbevents.js

175 ms

zipping-white.png

1306 ms

email-decode.min.js

481 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Partner.zipping.in, 15% (9 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 13% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Accounts.zippingxpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 380.3 kB (67%)

Content Size

567.5 kB

After Optimization

187.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Partner.zipping.in main page is 567.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 397.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 48.8 kB
  • After minification 48.7 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Partner Zipping needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 112.3 kB
  • After minification 112.3 kB
  • After compression 84.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 311.7 kB

  • Original 397.7 kB
  • After minification 397.5 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Partner.zipping.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (76%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Partner Zipping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

partner.zipping.in

partner.zipping.in

461 ms

login

login

465 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

175 ms

zipping-white.png

zipping-white.png

1306 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

481 ms

libs.min.js

libs.min.js

470 ms

gallery-init.js

gallery-init.js

850 ms

axio-custom.js

axio-custom.js

850 ms

map-color-1.js

map-color-1.js

849 ms

js

js

957 ms

function.js

function.js

848 ms

bg-main-color-1.jpg

bg-main-color-1.jpg

846 ms

1711511629090739

1711511629090739

613 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

457 ms

fonts.min.css

fonts.min.css

313 ms

2258788564233339

2258788564233339

363 ms

gen_204

gen_204

193 ms

default

default

362 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

249 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

275 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

91 ms

RalewayRegular.woff

RalewayRegular.woff

1161 ms

RalewayMedium.woff

RalewayMedium.woff

359 ms

RalewayLight.woff

RalewayLight.woff

435 ms

RalewayBold.woff

RalewayBold.woff

392 ms

RalewayExtraBold.woff

RalewayExtraBold.woff

363 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

434 ms

collect

collect

48 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

10 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

mNPLRtAliPg

mNPLRtAliPg

91 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

46 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

97 ms

base.js

base.js

140 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

91 ms

RalewayMedium.ttf

RalewayMedium.ttf

443 ms

RalewayExtraBold.ttf

RalewayExtraBold.ttf

438 ms

RalewayBold.ttf

RalewayBold.ttf

444 ms

RalewayLight.ttf

RalewayLight.ttf

429 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

426 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

208 ms

RLowZH2Xcwtj3dY_yGSeKf8RcILu2Rj3JTO2BWyvP7U.js

RLowZH2Xcwtj3dY_yGSeKf8RcILu2Rj3JTO2BWyvP7U.js

129 ms

embed.js

embed.js

33 ms

id

id

44 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

219 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

219 ms

Create

Create

201 ms

color.min.css

color.min.css

73 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

436 ms

RalewayRegular.ttf

RalewayRegular.ttf

396 ms

pattern-color-1.svg

pattern-color-1.svg

338 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

44 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

76 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

105 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

119 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

155 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

227 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

201 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

127 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

168 ms

Accessibility Review

partner.zipping.in accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

partner.zipping.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

partner.zipping.in SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Partner.zipping.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Partner.zipping.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

partner.zipping.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Partner Zipping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: