20.3 sec in total
1.4 sec
16.7 sec
2.2 sec
Click here to check amazing ZEFT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zeft.in
Elevate your career with ZEFT Business School's prestigious MBA programs. Explore the world of data-driven decision-making with our MBA in Business Analytics, or master the digital landscape with...
Visit zeft.inWe analyzed Zeft.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 18.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
zeft.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value19.3 s
0/100
10%
Value5,310 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.091
92/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
1439 ms
11898 ms
33 ms
448 ms
658 ms
Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Zeft.in, 13% (15 requests) were made to Google.com and 11% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Zeft.in.
Page size can be reduced by 173.4 kB (8%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Zeft.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 132.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ZEFT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zeft.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (61%)
110
43
The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ZEFT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
zeft.in
1439 ms
zeft.in
11898 ms
css
33 ms
style.min.css
448 ms
animate.css
658 ms
styles.css
663 ms
public.css
663 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
676 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
677 ms
frontend.min.css
900 ms
post-2669.css
874 ms
font-awesome.min.css
882 ms
global.css
881 ms
post-10.css
896 ms
css
57 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1121 ms
icofont.css
1090 ms
magnific-popup.css
1101 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
1098 ms
woocommerce.css
1118 ms
gutenberg.css
1126 ms
master.css
1309 ms
css
55 ms
jquery.min.js
1538 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1323 ms
ays-pb-public.js
1341 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1291 ms
ays-pb-public.css
1132 ms
animations.min.css
1316 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1417 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1419 ms
index.js
1418 ms
public.js
1418 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1552 ms
popper.min.js
1558 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1561 ms
jquery.jCounter.js
1581 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1583 ms
script.js
1582 ms
forms.js
1750 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1763 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1541 ms
waypoints.min.js
1366 ms
core.min.js
1365 ms
swiper.min.js
1370 ms
share-link.min.js
1535 ms
dialog.min.js
1536 ms
frontend.min.js
1341 ms
elementor.js
1367 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1367 ms
2ffc7ddfcfbc284c87645e638.js
182 ms
gtm.js
115 ms
maps
105 ms
site-logo.png
788 ms
zeft-Film-school-site-main-image.jpg
1285 ms
banner_img-1.png
1285 ms
speaker_bg.png
845 ms
our-mission.jpg
1100 ms
9.jpg
1103 ms
8.jpg
1108 ms
7.jpg
1285 ms
5.jpg
1680 ms
4.jpg
1681 ms
3.jpg
1681 ms
2.jpg
1755 ms
T1.jpg
1507 ms
t2.jpg
1506 ms
t3.jpg
1721 ms
t5.jpg
1716 ms
chennai.jpg
1975 ms
Direction_memphis1.png
1739 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1742 ms
embed
384 ms
conversion_async.js
44 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
fbevents.js
19 ms
413384282829400
106 ms
collect
29 ms
29 ms
iconfont.ttf
1752 ms
take-your-first-step.jpg
1788 ms
newsletter_bg.jpg
1785 ms
20 ms
js
20 ms
gen_204
465 ms
init_embed.js
19 ms
common.js
56 ms
util.js
67 ms
map.js
75 ms
overlay.js
49 ms
onion.js
43 ms
search_impl.js
43 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
514 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
106 ms
kh
46 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
90 ms
vt
184 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
19 ms
vt
183 ms
vt
199 ms
vt
186 ms
vt
176 ms
vt
180 ms
vt
263 ms
vt
279 ms
vt
296 ms
vt
295 ms
vt
287 ms
vt
328 ms
vt
468 ms
QuotaService.RecordEvent
15 ms
controls.js
6 ms
css
120 ms
css
118 ms
entity11.png
66 ms
zeft.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
zeft.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
zeft.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zeft.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zeft.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zeft.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ZEFT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: