Tools & Wizards About Us
zehawk.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

zehawk.in

Premium photography and design - Amit Bansal Images

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

642 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

529 ms

zehawk.in screenshot

About Website

Visit zehawk.in now to see the best up-to-date Zehawk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about zehawk.in

Offering personalized services to individuals, small businesses & startups for digital visual media needs: Photography, online branding and graphic design

Visit zehawk.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Zehawk.in page load time and found that the first response time was 642 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zehawk.in performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.17

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zehawk.in

642 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1530 ms

style.min.css

555 ms

foobox.free.min.css

552 ms

style.css

535 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Zehawk.in, 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Zehawk.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

627.1 kB

After Optimization

591.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zehawk.in main page is 627.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 374.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 18.0 kB

  • Original 24.6 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 374.0 kB
  • After minification 358.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zehawk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 748 B

  • Original 96.5 kB
  • After minification 96.5 kB
  • After compression 95.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 131.9 kB
  • After minification 131.9 kB
  • After compression 130.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zehawk.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (76%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zehawk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zehawk.in

zehawk.in

642 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1530 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

555 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

552 ms

style.css

style.css

535 ms

style.css

style.css

1047 ms

css

css

36 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

799 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1317 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1106 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

560 ms

recaptcha.js

recaptcha.js

1106 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

1552 ms

et-divi-customizer-global-16624921030735.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global-16624921030735.min.css

2496 ms

css

css

46 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

2374 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1600 ms

common.js

common.js

1829 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2047 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

Mini-logo-150.png

Mini-logo-150.png

556 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

744 ms

zehawk.in

zehawk.in

317 ms

Hero-image-1-1.jpg

Hero-image-1-1.jpg

1793 ms

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf

59 ms

Accessibility Review

zehawk.in accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

zehawk.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

zehawk.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zehawk.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zehawk.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zehawk.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zehawk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: