5.3 sec in total
821 ms
3.9 sec
503 ms
Visit zelst.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Zelst content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about zelst.co.uk
Highly experienced search marketing agency that helps clients be seen and get found online through creative and strategic search marketing.
Visit zelst.co.ukWe analyzed Zelst.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 821 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
zelst.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value22,150 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.113
86/100
15%
Value34.7 s
0/100
10%
821 ms
32 ms
240 ms
249 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Zelst.co.uk, 11% (9 requests) were made to O.twimg.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Zelst.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (32%)
3.2 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Zelst.co.uk main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zelst images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 574.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 574.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zelst.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (59%)
73
30
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zelst. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.zelst.co.uk
821 ms
powr.js
32 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
240 ms
styles.css
249 ms
style.css
265 ms
widget-style.php
1199 ms
form-style.php
981 ms
settings.css
456 ms
prettyPhoto.css
325 ms
default.css
330 ms
frontend.css
347 ms
css
63 ms
genericons.css
414 ms
style.css
654 ms
footer-credits.css
430 ms
style.css
500 ms
jquery.js
755 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
547 ms
public.js
585 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
820 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
839 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
736 ms
EasyGalleryLoader.js
819 ms
output.css
837 ms
addthis_widget.js
45 ms
jquery.form.min.js
843 ms
scripts.js
852 ms
masonry.min.js
860 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
864 ms
slider.js
925 ms
functions.js
946 ms
wp-embed.min.js
946 ms
analytics.js
132 ms
social-sprite.png
137 ms
logo.jpg
384 ms
phone.jpg
384 ms
cherry-blossom2.jpg
915 ms
94326220.png
135 ms
ranking-factors-robot.png
833 ms
robot-1000x576.jpg
484 ms
panda-1038x576.jpg
515 ms
White-teeth-charlie-804x576.jpg
568 ms
Bruges.jpg
782 ms
brimham-rocks-976x576.jpg
802 ms
google-partner-badge.jpg
601 ms
bing-bds-accredited-badge.png
661 ms
pattern-dark.svg
657 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
99 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
327 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
344 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
392 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
53 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
390 ms
XNVd6tsqi9wmKNvnh5HNEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
368 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
390 ms
widgets.js
315 ms
collect
250 ms
collect
336 ms
300lo.json
151 ms
ajax-loader.gif
421 ms
sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html
57 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
16 ms
ga-audiences
38 ms
syndication
86 ms
565466808996868096
185 ms
1f388.png
43 ms
proxy.jpg
71 ms
1f4a1.png
36 ms
proxy.jpg
35 ms
proxy.jpg
39 ms
proxy.jpg
37 ms
proxy.jpg
38 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
16 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
27 ms
-X7_HApV_normal.png
125 ms
Mv4fgDci_normal.jpg
145 ms
2a171a56f1b5d74060bc1cb619e1fb7e_normal.jpeg
204 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
36 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
33 ms
proxy.jpg
6 ms
proxy.jpg
6 ms
proxy.jpg
3 ms
proxy.jpg
4 ms
zelst.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
zelst.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
zelst.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zelst.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zelst.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zelst.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zelst. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: