Tools & Wizards About Us
zenit.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

zenit.io

Zenit.io Where Processes become reality | Nr1 business solutions

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

312 ms

zenit.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Zenit content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zenit.io

Zenit.io makes Processes become reality, the pragmatic business architects helping you grow your business, call us for more information.

Visit zenit.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Zenit.io page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zenit.io performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.116

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zenit.io

213 ms

zenit.io

2258 ms

styles.css

402 ms

styles.css

263 ms

general.min.css

381 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Zenit.io, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Zenit.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 232.1 kB (62%)

Content Size

373.1 kB

After Optimization

140.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Zenit.io main page is 373.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 275.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 231.9 kB

  • Original 275.3 kB
  • After minification 273.5 kB
  • After compression 43.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 231.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zenit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 244 B

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB
  • After compression 76.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (89%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zenit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zenit.io

zenit.io

213 ms

zenit.io

zenit.io

2258 ms

styles.css

styles.css

402 ms

styles.css

styles.css

263 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

381 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

374 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

284 ms

cms-navigation-base.css

cms-navigation-base.css

407 ms

cms-navigation.css

cms-navigation.css

376 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

486 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

472 ms

style.css

style.css

812 ms

element-fancy-box.css

element-fancy-box.css

620 ms

element-animated-title.css

element-animated-title.css

505 ms

element-post-grid.css

element-post-grid.css

675 ms

element-wpb-column-border.css

element-wpb-column-border.css

583 ms

cf7.css

cf7.css

601 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

603 ms

select2.css

select2.css

825 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

783 ms

widget-nectar-posts.css

widget-nectar-posts.css

620 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

778 ms

style.css

style.css

702 ms

css

css

31 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

777 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1023 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

796 ms

app.js

app.js

1014 ms

zenit.io

zenit.io

2193 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

970 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

936 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

937 ms

core.css

core.css

1282 ms

slide-out-right-hover.css

slide-out-right-hover.css

1102 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1300 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1282 ms

index.js

index.js

1281 ms

index.js

index.js

1298 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

1358 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1191 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

1172 ms

priority.js

priority.js

1081 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

1078 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

1172 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

1145 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

1149 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1159 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

1059 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

1137 ms

init.js

init.js

1231 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

1046 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

1131 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1111 ms

a2y5ndfvzm

a2y5ndfvzm

225 ms

Zenit-logo-def.png

Zenit-logo-def.png

569 ms

Zenit-diap-logo-def.png

Zenit-diap-logo-def.png

575 ms

sun-small-still.jpg

sun-small-still.jpg

648 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

17 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

67 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

90 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

90 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

448 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

541 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

183 ms

Accessibility Review

zenit.io accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

zenit.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

zenit.io SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zenit.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zenit.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zenit.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zenit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: