11.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
9.9 sec
154 ms
Click here to check amazing Zicopa content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zicopa.org
Visit zicopa.orgWe analyzed Zicopa.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
zicopa.org performance score
1598 ms
46 ms
30 ms
296 ms
864 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Zicopa.org, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Powr.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Zicopa.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (50%)
3.9 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Zicopa.org main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 249.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zicopa needs image optimization as it can save up to 249.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 402.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 402.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zicopa.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (86%)
57
8
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zicopa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.zicopa.org
1598 ms
powr.js
46 ms
webfont.js
30 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
296 ms
www.zicopa.org
864 ms
dashicons.min.css
818 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
554 ms
styles.css
560 ms
settings.css
561 ms
wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css
606 ms
css
31 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1112 ms
simple-line-icons.css
855 ms
animate.min.css
851 ms
font-awesome.min.css
895 ms
style.css
1636 ms
socials.css
1133 ms
style-dynamic.php
1507 ms
responsive.css
1138 ms
cubeportfolio.min.css
1449 ms
magnific-popup.css
1394 ms
owl.carousel.css
1415 ms
js_composer.min.css
1956 ms
general_foundicons.css
1677 ms
social_foundicons.css
1698 ms
otw_shortcode.css
2004 ms
jquery.js
2056 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1920 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2231 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1985 ms
swiper.min.css
2204 ms
post-like.min.js
2260 ms
core.min.js
2283 ms
widget.min.js
2288 ms
mouse.min.js
2340 ms
resizable.min.js
2486 ms
draggable.min.js
2514 ms
button.min.js
2513 ms
position.min.js
2555 ms
dialog.min.js
2571 ms
wpdialog.min.js
2332 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2223 ms
scripts.js
2241 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2237 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2237 ms
waypoints.min.js
2050 ms
jquery.appear.js
2055 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
2202 ms
jquery.custom.js
2218 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2185 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2007 ms
swiper.min.js
2285 ms
st2_bg.png
3308 ms
zicopa-1.png
4273 ms
zicopa.png
2396 ms
african_culture-1.jpg
1365 ms
african-dancing-children_my-fav-1.jpg
1939 ms
afriky-lolo-west-african-dance-43-936x481-1.jpg
3568 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
11 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
19 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
24 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
18 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
23 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1897 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
2186 ms
zicopa.org SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zicopa.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zicopa.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zicopa.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zicopa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: