Tools & Wizards About Us
zigdeal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

zigdeal.com

ZIGDEAL

Page Load Speed

17.2 sec in total

First Response

426 ms

Resources Loaded

16 sec

Page Rendered

825 ms

zigdeal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ZIGDEAL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zigdeal.com

The Complete IT Store

Visit zigdeal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Zigdeal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 16.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zigdeal.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.235

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zigdeal.com

426 ms

zigdeal.in

2051 ms

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

804 ms

lib.css

800 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Zigdeal.com, 91% (96 requests) were made to Zigdeal.in and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) relates to the external source Zigdeal.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 387.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

774.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zigdeal.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 506.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 308.2 kB

  • Original 341.8 kB
  • After minification 264.8 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 77.0 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 308.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 506.8 kB
  • After minification 494.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ZIGDEAL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 170.9 kB
  • After minification 170.8 kB
  • After compression 124.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 142.3 kB
  • After minification 142.3 kB
  • After compression 122.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zigdeal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (68%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ZIGDEAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zigdeal.com

zigdeal.com

426 ms

zigdeal.in

zigdeal.in

2051 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

804 ms

lib.css

lib.css

800 ms

ie9-and-up.css

ie9-and-up.css

745 ms

custom.css

custom.css

738 ms

style.css

style.css

790 ms

animate.css

animate.css

908 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1466 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

1402 ms

style.css

style.css

804 ms

css3.css

css3.css

2054 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1492 ms

style.css

style.css

2069 ms

css3.css

css3.css

2677 ms

so-listing-tabs.css

so-listing-tabs.css

3066 ms

content_slider.css

content_slider.css

3054 ms

style_render_110.css

style_render_110.css

3048 ms

style.css

style.css

3051 ms

quickview.css

quickview.css

4081 ms

lib.css

lib.css

4067 ms

style.css

style.css

4077 ms

style_render_81.css

style_render_81.css

4061 ms

so_megamenu.css

so_megamenu.css

4047 ms

wide-grid.css

wide-grid.css

4051 ms

so_searchpro.css

so_searchpro.css

5066 ms

so_sociallogin.css

so_sociallogin.css

4698 ms

blue.css

blue.css

5165 ms

header1.css

header1.css

5066 ms

footer1.css

footer1.css

5083 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

5328 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

5657 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

5833 ms

libs.js

libs.js

5817 ms

so.system.js

so.system.js

5840 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

5828 ms

css

css

76 ms

css

css

87 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

5968 ms

so.custom.js

so.custom.js

6115 ms

common.js

common.js

5340 ms

custom.js

custom.js

5814 ms

jquery.easyembed.js

jquery.easyembed.js

5779 ms

toppanel.js

toppanel.js

5814 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

6218 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

5994 ms

slick.js

slick.js

5442 ms

content_slider.js

content_slider.js

5650 ms

section.js

section.js

5769 ms

modernizr.video.js

modernizr.video.js

5776 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

4563 ms

video_background.js

video_background.js

5201 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

4784 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

4718 ms

so_megamenu.js

so_megamenu.js

4638 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

4188 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

hot-icon.png

hot-icon.png

720 ms

new-icon.png

new-icon.png

669 ms

icon-1.png

icon-1.png

711 ms

icon-2.png

icon-2.png

695 ms

icon-3.png

icon-3.png

758 ms

icon-4.png

icon-4.png

255 ms

icon-5.png

icon-5.png

894 ms

icon-7.png

icon-7.png

1369 ms

icon-8.png

icon-8.png

1379 ms

icon-9.png

icon-9.png

1516 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1707 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1517 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2003 ms

cate1.jpg

cate1.jpg

2363 ms

cate2.jpg

cate2.jpg

2029 ms

cate3.jpg

cate3.jpg

2438 ms

cate4.jpg

cate4.jpg

2356 ms

cate5.jpg

cate5.jpg

2369 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

2883 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2957 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

3103 ms

banner-countdown.png

banner-countdown.png

3290 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

3025 ms

icon-image.png

icon-image.png

3324 ms

icon_general.png

icon_general.png

3551 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

22 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4046 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

23 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

35 ms

zd.jpg

zd.jpg

3164 ms

arrow-slider-left.png

arrow-slider-left.png

3637 ms

arrow-slider-right.png

arrow-slider-right.png

3833 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

43 ms

js

js

67 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

3852 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

1-650x510.jpg

1-650x510.jpg

3966 ms

HP%20COMPAQ%206005%20_SFF__AMD%20ATHLON%20DUAL%20CORE2-90x90.jpg

HP%20COMPAQ%206005%20_SFF__AMD%20ATHLON%20DUAL%20CORE2-90x90.jpg

3665 ms

HP%20COMPAQ%206200%20_SFF__2ND%20GEN2-90x90.jpg

HP%20COMPAQ%206200%20_SFF__2ND%20GEN2-90x90.jpg

3827 ms

HP%20COMPAQ%208200%20_MT__2ND%20GEN1-90x90.jpg

HP%20COMPAQ%208200%20_MT__2ND%20GEN1-90x90.jpg

4007 ms

bg-popupc.jpg

bg-popupc.jpg

4134 ms

css_sprites.png

css_sprites.png

3993 ms

41Snl3HlxCL-300x300.jpg

41Snl3HlxCL-300x300.jpg

3660 ms

61XF9iMZdrL._SL1500_-300x300.jpg

61XF9iMZdrL._SL1500_-300x300.jpg

3847 ms

2-650x510.jpg

2-650x510.jpg

1508 ms

DELL%20OPTIPLEX%20790%20_SFF__2ND%20GEN%20_2_-90x90.jpg

DELL%20OPTIPLEX%20790%20_SFF__2ND%20GEN%20_2_-90x90.jpg

546 ms

DELL%20OPTIPLEX%209010%20_SFF_%203RD%20GEN%20%20_2_-90x90.jpg

DELL%20OPTIPLEX%209010%20_SFF_%203RD%20GEN%20%20_2_-90x90.jpg

1188 ms

3-650x510.jpg

3-650x510.jpg

750 ms

Accessibility Review

zigdeal.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

zigdeal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

zigdeal.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zigdeal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zigdeal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zigdeal.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ZIGDEAL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: