Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

286 ms

ziggedy.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ziggedy.com now to see the best up-to-date Ziggedy content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ziggedy.com

Visit ziggedy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ziggedy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ziggedy.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ziggedy.com

199 ms

www.ziggedy.com

371 ms

css

29 ms

serve

50 ms

serve

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Ziggedy.com, 37% (28 requests) were made to Cdn.ziggedy.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.ziggedy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 621.2 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Ziggedy.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 976.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 97.1 kB

  • Original 115.6 kB
  • After minification 87.5 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 976.0 kB
  • After minification 936.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ziggedy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 282.7 kB

  • Original 430.9 kB
  • After minification 426.9 kB
  • After compression 148.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 282.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.2 kB

  • Original 243.4 kB
  • After minification 243.3 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ziggedy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (29%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ziggedy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ziggedy.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

ziggedy.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ziggedy.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ziggedy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ziggedy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ziggedy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: